Navy workout routines centered on the preparation and use of non-strategic NUCLEAR weapons have begun in Russia, in keeping with the Russian Ministry of Protection.
In the course of the first section of the nuclear workout routines, duties embody receiving munitions for the “Iskander” missile system and… pic.twitter.com/aDXctxNZqD
— Russian Market (@runews) Might 21, 2024
The West has made it clear that they’re completely prepared to danger a nuclear warfare of their quest to dominate the previous japanese Ukraine.
The scenario attracts consideration to the truth that the individuals operating the Western world aren’t merely diabolical, but in addition inconceivably silly. It’s been stated 1,000,000 instances, however there isn’t any strategic relevance for the West to the japanese Ukraine. It’s extraordinarily related to the Russians, in fact, which is why the Individuals had been fascinated about it. They had been trying to make use of the battle within the Ukraine to trigger a collapse of the Russian state. The difficulty, nonetheless, is that this didn’t work. The Russian state didn’t collapse.
There’s now very severe confusion as to what the aim of the warfare really is. It’s clearly inconceivable for the Ukraine to win. Nobody is even making that declare anymore. As a substitute, the West is speaking about escalating to some form of nuclear scenario.
Nobody has any concept what the logic of that is. All we are able to do is observe their actions. Their statements don’t imply something.
I wouldn’t declare to know what is definitely happening. However the factor seems to be operating on inertia.
There’s:
- Large graft within the US and the Ukraine
- Jewish hatred for Russia
- Arms trade lobbying
- NATO management obsession with warfare
- US want to weaken Europe
- A basic American coverage of at all times being at warfare with somebody
- Sunk prices
- Precise lunatics who need to escalate to a World Conflict and/or imagine that Russia is trying to reestablish a Christian model of the Soviet Union
There doesn’t appear to be any core logic. It’s simply these numerous various factors.
A lot of it’s the similar form of factor that saved the US concerned in Afghanistan for therefore lengthy. It’s simply that in Afghanistan, there have been successfully zero stakes. Within the scenario within the Ukraine, the stakes are probably nuclear warfare, which may kill billions of individuals.
NOTE: I don’t imagine the gibberish about nuclear winter and I’m not satisfied that the entire nukes can be fired. I just lately watched a part of an interview with that mulatto man from the UK and a few lady who wrote a e book about nuclear warfare.
It was fairly boring. Simply principally Nineteen Eighties propaganda. Would everybody really fireplace all of the nukes if one nuke was fired? I critically doubt it. And even when they did, the entire “nuclear winter” factor just isn’t even actual.
In an act of pure masochism, I just lately reread “The Highway” by my all time favourite author Cormac McCarthy. (I’m being sarcastic. McCarthy is the worst author and a Biden-tier blight on the Irish race.) This form of factor is simply goofbally. A nuclear warfare would really in all probability be a great factor.
However I don’t suppose whoever is in cost really needs a nuclear warfare. Once more, we don’t know. We don’t even actually know who’s in cost. Apparently, it’s Antony Blinken, Jake Sullivan, after which secondarily, some individuals like David Cameron and Boris Johnson. It seems to make sense that these persons are in cost, and they’re simply very dumb.
To be clear, “tactical nuclear weapon” is jargon that principally means a small bomb. The US has stated that if Russia hit the Ukraine with such a bomb, they might not nuke Russia, however would blow up their complete navy. That’s what David Petraeus stated, at the very least, and he seemed to be talking in a semi-official capability – form of taking part in a spokesman position.
That was practically two years in the past, however I’m not conscious of some other assertion being made by a related official as to how the US would reply if such a nuke was used within the Ukraine.
This assertion from Petraeus is nonsensical, nonetheless, as if NATO attacked Russia on the dimensions he steered, Russia would begin firing actual nukes at European and presumably American cities. Principally, if Russia used a small nuke within the Ukraine, NATO would both have to start out a nuclear warfare or simply do nothing – perhaps ship some NATO forces into the Ukraine, which might successfully set off a sequence of occasions resulting in Russia firing severe nukes.
All that having been stated, though Russia is presently doing “tactical nuke” drills on the Ukraine border, it’s not clear that the Ukraine is the goal they’re probably threatening.
Russian forces have began navy drills close to Ukraine simulating the usage of tactical nuclear weapons in response to what Moscow deems threats from western officers about elevated involvement within the battle.Vladimir Putin ordered the drills earlier this month in a transfer Russian officers stated was a warning to the west to not escalate tensions additional.
The Kremlin has notably been angered by the French president, Emmanuel Macron, who floated the potential for sending European troops to struggle Russia in Ukraine, and by remarks from the UK international secretary, David Cameron, who stated Ukraine had the proper to make use of weapons provided by London to focus on websites in Russia.
Claiming that Russia has been “angered” is editorializing. I don’t suppose they meant it to be editorializing, I believe it’s simply poor writing. Russia is responding logically. There is no such thing as a emotion right here. At the very least there isn’t any seen emotion. Not like the Individuals, no high Russian official is ever emotional in public, save for Medvedev, who’s principally a form of “fan service” determine for the Russian individuals. However Putin, his spokesman Peskov, high diplomat Lavrov – none of those persons are ever emotional in public.
Properly, Putin shed a number of tears at his election victory occasion whereas singing a patriotic tune. So I assume that’s emotion. Nevertheless it’s love for the nation and the individuals. (I additionally suspect it’s fairly laborious on him that he has to ship boys to die within the Ukraine. That’s what I thought of once I noticed the tears on the occasion in Purple Sq..)
In distinction, the Individuals are unhinged. Keep in mind that speech Joe Biden gave the place he was screaming on a darkish stage with blood-red lights?
In the event you simply search “Biden screaming” you get an entire lot of clips.
He’s clearly a senile and deranged outdated man, and these flashes of rage are comparatively regular for somebody together with his stage of dementia. However he’s nonetheless the pinnacle of the American state.
Antony Blinken doesn’t get offended, however he at all times appears to be like like he’s shaking, prepared to twist up within the fetal place and begin weeping.
Then you will have an entire bunch of various American officers who go on TV screaming about all of the individuals they’re going to kill. Lindsey Graham is essentially the most notable, in all probability, however Tom Cotton, Josh Hawley, Marco Rubio, all the varied Jew Democrats – most people you see within the American authorities seem very emotionally unstable. It’s very uncommon to see regular individuals appearing like American politicians act except they’re drunk or on medication. Possibly poor individuals get emotional like this, I’m not likely certain, however I’m not in my life round this form of factor. (Once more, except persons are ingesting, and I don’t suppose these persons are ingesting. They could possibly be on medication.)
So, it’s very attention-grabbing that The Guardian would use the phrase “anger” in relation to Russia. Once more, I believe it’s simply unhealthy writing.
“The Kremlin has notably been angered by…” ought to be “The Kremlin has particularly cited…”
However a telling little bit of unhealthy writing.
Nuclear warfare is the best risk going through humanity
as a result of pussy politicians need to choose a struggle
Russia IS NOT my enemy pic.twitter.com/6JN02HmZOY
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) March 24, 2024
For me, the strangest factor is how unconcerned everybody seems to be about the specter of nuclear warfare.
In the course of the Chilly Conflict, individuals lived in fixed panic. Or, at the very least that is the way it’s portrayed. There’s a a lot, a lot larger likelihood {that a} nuclear warfare may occur now than there ever was throughout the Chilly Conflict, and but we’re not even getting PSAs about what we’re speculated to do if it occurs.
Piers Morgan informed John Mearsheimer that lots of of hundreds of thousands of individuals dying in nuclear warfare can be value it to show some extent to Putin that we love democracy.
(Forgive me, I don’t have the timestamp. The complete interview is fascinating, insofar as Morgan is consultant of well-liked opinion.)
That was a very surreal interview, which nearly led me to imagine that Morgan is a few sort of troll, pretending to be retarded with a view to spotlight the madness of individuals cavalierly dismissing the specter of London, New York, Chicago, and so forth getting blown off the map.
May there be some sort of secret plan at work right here?
To my data, there isn’t any proof in any respect that something is occurring past what seems to be taking place: the Western world is run by people who find themselves each evil and silly, and they’re appearing on the related impulses, trying to reestablish a unipolar world dominated by the US, and doing so in a vogue that’s maniacal and sure to finish in catastrophic failure of some kind.
However, above I discussed The Highway, a piece of fiction which we are able to level to when analyzing how the favored thoughts conceives of a possible nuclear warfare. A modern notion amongst literature aficionados is that fiction is primarily about aesthetics. Personally, though I’m fascinated about literary aesthetics, I like fiction primarily as a result of it incorporates concepts. This idea that literature is primarily about aesthetics is successfully nihilistic, in my opinion. That is what will get us Thomas Pynchon, Cormac McCarthy, and David Foster Wallace and every thing that sprouted from the works of these horrible males. Even Ernest Hemingway, hack that he was, wouldn’t let you know that literature was primarily about aesthetics.
Two items of puerile fiction coping with nuclear warfare that I just lately consumed shared an idea which I discovered fairly intriguing.
After watching the quite horrible (although mildly mesmerizing) Apple TV sequence “Silo,” and being extraordinarily pissed off by the cliffhanger ending, I went and skim the sequence of novels (Wool and Shift by Hugh Howey). The story is about fallout shelters, the titular silos, the place individuals have been dwelling for lots of of years. The massive reveal is that authorities officers constructed the shelters after which purposefully began a nuclear warfare to wipe out the entire remainder of humanity in order that the human species may begin anew with a small, unified inhabitants rising from the silos when the floor grew to become liveable once more.
I meant to write down about this a yr or so in the past, after which form of forgot about it (as I do with many issues I intend to write down about). Then, towards my higher judgement, I subjected myself to Amazon’s Fallout sequence, based mostly on the online game sequence of the identical title. With the CEO of the sport’s developer, Todd Howard of Bethesda, serving as an government producer, the sequence was meant to be a part of the Fallout canon. Nonetheless, it contained a brand new piece of lore: the individuals who constructed the fallout shelters (generally known as “vaults” within the sequence) purposefully began a nuclear warfare with a view to filter the planet and permit people to emerge into a brand new world. It was successfully the identical plot as Silo/Wool.
Wool was printed in 2011, so it’s doable the writers of the Fallout sequence had learn it. (I’ve learn, watched, and gamed loads of science fiction, and I’ve by no means come throughout this plot level anyplace else.) Nevertheless it’s additionally doable that a couple of individual thought up this concept, as a result of it simply form of is smart once you take a look at the way in which the world is treating the concept of a catastrophic world nuclear warfare.
Once more: there isn’t any proof of this, and subsequently no purpose to imagine it. However I’ve thought of it so much since coming throughout the idea a second time within the Fallout sequence. There are individuals who we all know are making ready fallout shelters. It’s turn out to be extremely popular in New Zealand. Mark Zuckerberg has constructed what WIRED calls “an underground metropolis” in Hawaii. The reported price is $100 million, however it’s probably rather more than that. It was meant to be secret, however is now simply “secretive.”
Jeff Bezos little doubt has such a bunker, however there isn’t any document of it. Apparently, he did a greater job of maintaining it secret than Zuckerberg did. And there are in fact numerous rumors about huge underground cities run by the US navy.
Whereas it’s clear that the individuals operating the US authorities are successfully retarded, I don’t suppose we are able to say the identical in regards to the world’s numerous billionaires. Being a Western politician requires no abilities in any respect, the singular requirement being a complete lack of any regular type of human morality (previous a sure degree, you’re additionally in all probability required to interact in some sickening act on video with a view to make sure you received’t step out of line). It’s definitely attention-grabbing that no billionaire, save Elon Musk and the forged of the All-In podcast, is making any problem of what seems to be a senseless dance right into a nuclear warfare.
Jeff Bezos, whose firm printed Wool and produced the Fallout sequence, owns the Washington Publish, which is one the first publications accountable for normalizing the concept of a nuclear warfare to guard democracy within the Ukraine.
Max Boot is such an clever and sincere man. Loopy he spent a lot effort attempting to persuade the world that the Ukraine was going to win a warfare towards Russia
Billionaires constructing shelters is simply one thing apparent. After all they might do such a factor. However you’ll suppose in the event that they had been towards a nuclear warfare, they might be stepping in and paying politicians to again off. It’s a cliche, but in addition true that politicians will take cash to advertise something. If billionaires needed it, there can be a severe contingent in Congress pushing again towards this transfer in the direction of nuclear warfare.
I’m simply throwing it on the market
In the end, I doubt there’s a secret plan by the worldwide elite to start out a nuclear warfare to wipe out many of the world’s inhabitants whereas maintaining a small portion of individuals in fallout shelters to emerge and kind a brand new world, the place they protect the earth’s restricted assets and aren’t being dragged down by the useless weight of “ineffective eaters.”
Almost definitely, that is all simply precisely what it appears to be like like: the West is being dominated by a bunch of lunatic Jews and morons who’re unrestrained as there are not any adults left within the room, and they’re in the end going to push the world to the brink, at which level China will pull off an financial and diplomatic miracle and hold the world from ending.
