Rumble hyperlink Bitchute hyperlink
I first critically learn Emerson for an American Renaissance seminar at San Francisco State College within the mid-80s. I used to be the one pupil who truly loved the sonorous cadences of the sage of Harmony. My classmates thought I used to be bluffing, or, failing that, perverse.
Emerson’s encomiums to authenticity, nature, and the transcendent resonated with me. This was one of the best of the American non secular inheritance, of what Harold Bloom known as the American faith. Amongst all of the cults and Bible-thumpers and maladapted European sects, Emerson’s Unitarianism was uniquely nourishing, and uniquely “American in an excellent sense.” It had impressed Thoreau, a hero of my days in the highschool library. I acknowledged belatedly that this was the faith I had inherited, to the extent I had inherited any, from my grandmother, a member of the congregation on the well-known Frank Lloyd Wright church in Madison, WI.
Sadly, by the late twentieth century, Unitarianism had deserted its Enlightenment roots and change into a faith of “something goes.” So long as you possibly can sing Kumbaya off-key, you’re in. As we speak we’ve got Unitarian ministers who don’t imagine in God. Little question there shall be Satanist Unitarian ministers within the not-too-distant future. (Will they carry out human sacrifices throughout Kumbaya sing-alongs?)
Unitarianism and America have gone loopy. That’s one cause I accepted Islam (“Unitarianism with camels”) and finally discovered my technique to Morocco. I now discover myself agreeing with E. Michael Jones and the Ayatollah Khomeini that America is “the Nice Devil.”
However is that Emerson’s fault? Dr. Jones thinks the sage of Harmony was some type of proto-satanist who bears duty for all that adopted. That is probably not as unfair as blaming Jesus for the Crusades and Inquisition, however nonetheless.
Under is my latest debate with E. Michael Jones on the query, “Was Emerson a satanist?” Notice that Emersonian Unitarianism, like Islam, rejects the Trinity in favor of Divine Unity, focuses on Jesus’s message fairly than his mode of demise, and doesn’t settle for the doctrine of Unique Sin.
KB: Effectively, we’ll speak about that extra, however right here’s one other fascinating lengthy story on the demographic revolution. Everyone who’s vulnerable to the propaganda from the trendy secular world pushing us in the direction of hedonism, individualism, and anomie won’t have youngsters, or only a few, whereas the minority of people who find themselves resistant to that propaganda and proceed to have massive households will depart all of humanity as their descendants. And people persons are, by and huge, spiritual.
So demographers are noticing that the long run is more likely to be extra spiritual than the current, as a result of that minority of people who find themselves nonetheless having massive households is disproportionately spiritual. And that’s going to steer as much as our dialogue of Emerson and issues of faith, as a result of faith goes to matter in a world that goes again to faith.
EMJ: Yeah, properly, the meek will inherit the earth.
Was it Emerson who that stated that?
No. Fairly the alternative.
And that leads us to “Cherchez le Juif,” which is the article that set off the Emerson debate. That was your newest article within the type of a ebook assessment of La Défaite de l’Occident by Immanuel Todd. It’s a wonderful assessment. I agreed with nearly every thing. Let’s speak about the remainder of the article after which the half about Emerson.
Yeah, so I’m saying America’s the good Devil. How are you going to disagree with me?
I don’t. I believe you bought that half proper.
Effectively, then let’s get into the woods. Let’s get into the weeds right here of the way it turned the good Devil, which is principally my new venture. I’m engaged on a ebook about American id. And that’s what Todd is speaking about. He stated principally that the American empire is failing as a result of the hidden grammar of the American empire is Protestantism and Protestantism has evaporated. That’s, I believe, a sound thesis. I believe that’s precisely what’s happening.
However then we’ve got to get into the weeds right here. Effectively, what do you imply by Protestantism? What’s it? He goes to the Max Weber thesis, which is a complete cliché that distracts everybody from the actual story, which is that Max Weber’s Spirit of Capitalism was written in response to Sombart’s ebook, which says principally the Puritans have been Jews.
That’s a key subject. He doesn’t perceive what Protestantism is. He simply has this cliché.
What’s the essence of Protestantism? Particularly Puritan Protestantism? Who wrote the epic, the Protestant epic? It’s John Milton, the Puritan, who signed the demise warrant of the king after which wrote Paradise Misplaced.
And who’s the hero of Paradise Misplaced? It’s the satan. And so Satanism is the essence of Puritanism, which is the essence of Protestantism, which is the essence of America.
He additionally doesn’t actually give full justice to the truth that the group that dethroned the Protestants is, in fact, the Jews.
As a result of he’s a Jew. And in case you’re a Jew, “Jew” shouldn’t be a class. It’s like asking a fish, “are you moist?” No, the fish doesn’t know he’s moist. And the Jew doesn’t perceive his personal class.
Let’s transfer on then to the half that we’re planning to debate, which is the query: “Was Emerson a Satanist?” I definitely wouldn’t disagree with you that the hero of Paradise Misplaced is Devil. William Blake famously made a giant deal out of that. And sure, sure sorts of extremely individualistic mysticism can veer off into Satanism.
And the query is, is that this the case for Ralph Waldo Emerson, the good American Unitarian? And since I’m a lapsed Unitarian who then ended up on a camel—Muslims being Unitarians with camels, as you knowledgeable me way back—I really feel it’s incumbent upon me to defend the turgid prose of Ralph Waldo Emerson. I see Emerson as extra of a mystic who can be similar to a drunken Sufi.
Sufism, Islamic mysticism, break up into the sober Sufism of Junayd and the drunken Sufism of individuals like al-Hallaj, who famously blurted out, I’m the reality. And al-Haq, The Fact, means God. So Hallaj was taken by his friends as saying, I’m God, which in fact can be a satanic type of factor to say. So he ended up getting actually crucified for that, and for numerous different political intrigues happening on the time.
In any case, he blurted out these items from deep in his non secular state, a few of which have been removed from constant or prudent. That’s the drunken Sufi custom.
Definitely in “Self Reliance,” Emerson veers off in that route to a sure extent. That type of “drunken mysticism” might be not one thing you wish to advocate.
However does that make him a Satanist?
I believe in case you learn the entire essay in context, and particularly within the context of his bigger physique of labor, there’s no method that Emerson is a Satanist. His essential disciple is Thoreau. Does Thoreau remind you of Anton LaVey or Michael Aquino? I don’t suppose so.
So he’s one thing apart from Satanist.
What about that passage? I’ve already cited the passage in “Self-Reliance” the place somebody says to him, “properly, suppose they (your inspirations) come from beneath?” “And I replied, they don’t appear to me to be such, but when I’m the satan’s baby, I’ll dwell then from the satan. No regulation could be sacred to me however that of my nature.” That’s Satanism. That’s the satan. He’s saying it himself. Now, the fascinating query is, is he the satan’s baby? Who stated he was the satan’s baby? What you have got right here is the response towards Calvinism. As a result of Calvin the Puritan stated that you simply have been completely wicked, and that was the legacy that he grew up with.
There have been individuals who may not- the drunken Sufis you’re speaking about have been referred to as antinomians in Massachusetts Bay Colony. Ann Hutchinson was certainly one of them. The Quakers are examples of this, the place you simply sit there and look ahead to God’s inspiration, the Holy Spirit, to encourage you, after which every thing you say is infallible. This is the reason no person may speak to a Quaker in Philadelphia. This is the reason they gave up on speaking and so they determined to do artwork.
It’s a must to contextualize this, okay? So that you’re speaking about Anton LaVey. There’s a sure interval within the decline and decay of American tradition that led to that, okay?
Perry Miller wrote an fascinating essay about what occurred right here at this explicit second in time (the mid-Nineteenth century). You had these individuals who have been Satanist revolutionaries theoretically, however they lived typical bourgeois lives when it got here to their households. And that’s exactly the the second we’re speaking about right here with Ralph Waldo Emerson, who was a neighbor of Nathaniel Hawthorne, who understood what it meant to be the satan’s baby, and wrote “Younger Goodman Brown” about that.
All this recognition of what Emerson was doing, however he was nonetheless the man…Rose Hawthorne would write memoirs about how “Mr. Emerson came visiting and gave me a chunk of sweet and patted me on the pinnacle.”
That doesn’t sound like a Satanist.
However intellectually, he was a Satanist, the identical method in a way that John Milton was a Satanist, as a result of I’m saying Satanism is the essence of Protestantism as a result of it’s primarily based on rebel. That’s the quintessence of America.
Yeah, properly, I believe there’s some reality to that. However once more, let’s take a look at what he’s saying in context, particularly the quote” “if I’m the satan’s baby, then I’ll dwell from the satan.” Let’s begin with the opening to “Self-Reliance,” the place he says, “I learn the opposite day some verses written by an eminent painter, which have been authentic and never typical.” What he’s speaking about is what in Islam we name niyyah or “intention.” Sprucing your niyyah is having good intentions. And purifying your coronary heart is one other mind-set about it.
Now, I believe Emerson is reacting to a particular scenario. It’s not simply that he’s surrounded by Puritans who’re fearful of the evil of (allegedly) wicked human nature, and he’s reacting towards that. Worse, he’s surrounded by hypocrites. Nifaq, hypocrisy, is without doubt one of the cardinal sins in Islam and doubtless all over the place else as properly. So he’s surrounded by people who find themselves not dwelling in tune with their true natures. That’s, they really feel one factor and so they say one other factor. They’re preaching advantage whereas training vice. And Emerson, as a critical spiritual particular person, desires to get his coronary heart to the purpose the place his coronary heart is virtuous. However what he sees round him is a profoundly corrupt society, as this puritanical American society has change into tremendous materialistic. And now everyone is worshiping “the Jewish God of cash,” as Marx stated. They usually’re saying issues about charity like “weshould all be saving the poor, ravenous folks of Haiti” or what have you ever. Whereas they’re possibly not taking good care of their very own households and folks in their very own group. There are all kinds of hypocrisy throughout him.
So what this essay is basically about is eliminating hypocrisy by purifying one’s intentions and going from “simply religion” all the way in which to non secular magnificence or purity. In Islam, that’s going from iman or religion, which is also translated as “coronary heart information,” to ihsan, or beautification of the soul.
His good friend asks, “However what if that’s from the satan?” As a result of his good friend continues to be this Puritan who’s afraid of his personal impulses. He’s been was a conflicted soul by the puritanical custom colliding with American materialism.
So Emerson’s saying, completely belief your self. “Your coronary heart is vibrating to that divine string.” (The road about trusting your actual nature “even when it have been from the satan”) is hyperbole. They (intuitions from his true nature) “don’t appear to be to be such” (from the satan) as a result of they’re not. It’s divine inspiration. It’s not satanic inspiration.
When hyperbolically, he says, “but when I’m the satan’s baby, I’ll dwell then from the satan,” that’s a rhetorical, hyperbolic assertion. And when he talks a couple of silly consistency because the hobgoblin of little minds, he’s speaking about individuals who take him too actually when he says one thing like this with out understanding the context.
Okay, that’s nice. It’s all the time been a thriller to me how you possibly can go from “Self-Reliance” to Islam as a result of Islam means submission, proper? So right here you have got the alternative of submission. You’ve got rebel. I imply, you’re making an attempt to clarify it, however when you say this, in case you’re a author, you launch one thing into the ether and also you don’t know the place it’s going to go. In the event you say you’re of the satan’s celebration and also you’re selling “belief thyself”…it occurred to Emerson throughout his lifetime, as a result of certainly one of his nice followers was Walt Whitman, the poet, who devoted Leaves of Grass to Emerson, inflicting him a lot embarrassment due to its homoerotic descriptions.
So I’m saying that the intention of the author shouldn’t be all the time one of the best information to how his works are going to be acquired. And I’m saying he situates himself in a trajectory that has led to the place we’re right this moment, which is principally “no person can inform me what to do.” It’s type of just like the libertarian stupidity that you simply discover in so many individuals, the place they’re being led round by the nostril, by the manipulation of their wishes, and so they contemplate themselves essentially the most impartial group of individuals on the planet.
I don’t disagree with you that his work situates itself in a trajectory that has led to excessive narcissism and self-indulgence. If there was any person following up on Emerson right this moment, expressing the spirit of this age the way in which he expressed the spirit of his age, they may name their essay “Self-Indulgence.”
I believe the essential subject is sexual morality. There’s a passage the place Emerson goes to England and he meets Carlyle. And Carlyle introduces him to German idealism, which is principally the place he obtained this concept that the thoughts is its personal place. That’s what Devil stated: “The thoughts is its personal place.” And now you’ve obtained Germans saying the identical factor, interpreted in keeping with this Puritan understanding. However Emerson obtained into an argument with Carlyle, and I believe Coleridge as properly, about sexual morality. He stated, “in case you suppose that the majority American males will not be virgins once they get married, you’re loopy.” I believe this turned the essential subject. That is what allowed the respectability in Harmony, the place Hawthorne and Emerson have been good married males—they’re fathers, they’re pillars of the group—on the identical time Emerson harboring the satanic notion of rebel that might attain its essential turning level with the collapse of sexual morality in America, which is what the Jews caused, and that’s how the Jews finally took over our tradition.
Effectively, once more, I agree. There’s lots of reality to that. However I believe that Emerson’s assumption was that the self that you simply’re being true to is the upper self, not the decrease self. And I believe he simply took that without any consideration within the essay “Self-Reliance”—though along with his hyperbole, possibly he confused some folks. However I believe that stark distinction between the upper self and the decrease self is a kind of issues that you must (intuitively) know, proper? You must know inside your self that the bestial lusts after all types of ego gratification, sensual gratification and so forth, the a part of you that desires to stuff your face when there’s some junk meals that’s superficially tasty, the identical type of factor in intercourse and all types of different bodily pleasures—that’s not what he’s speaking about, clearly.
However as you say, it may well lead there. So that you’re proper to some extent, Mike, that Emerson’s rebel towards the hypocrisy round him, which was tied into the institutional type of faith in a really materialistic society, had one thing harmful about it. Identical to the Protestant rebel towards Catholicism—and maybe, although I do know you wouldn’t agree with this, the Catholic rebel towards authentic Christianity which can have been greatest preserved in Orthodoxy. Every time Christianity goes west it will get worse, from Orthodoxy to Catholicism to Protestantism to secular atheist materialism.
In that context, Emerson is rejecting the hypocrisy and small-mindedness of the folks round him in that scenario (of puritanism giving technique to materialism). And that hypocrisy has been built-in into the institutional church. So Emerson is rebelling to some extent towards the institutional church. And that institutional church is critical and it may well’t be fully thrown away. You’ll be able to’t simply dwell for your self.
Effectively, that’s the issue. He had an institutional church that had no proper to be the institutional church as a result of it was conceived in rebel towards the church that Christ based. I’m speaking in regards to the Puritans. That’s not a church. That’s a sect that the English thought it was so loopy that they principally drove them out and hanged Cromwell’s physique as a result of it was so repugnant in so many alternative methods. However when it came visiting to America, it was the one sport on the town.
However I believe there’s one thing to this about this journey westward, definitely in America, as a result of at this level you’ve obtained, what do you have got? You’ve got a bunch of Englishmen displaying up in a world that they’d by no means seen earlier than and so they’re making an attempt to make sense of it. How do you do that? The one factor they’d was the Bible. And so one minister stated, we’re on an errand into the wilderness. And the wilderness he was speaking about was John the Baptist. It was a gloss on John the Baptist.
Effectively, the desert on the opposite aspect of the Jordan has nothing to do with Massachusetts, the forest, however that’s all they’d. And what occurred is as this settlement moved west, you had the essence is Calvinism coming into relationship with existence. Which is the woods. And it needed to be modified. They needed to modify it as a result of it didn’t work. They’d no legitimacy. The Protestants had no legitimacy as a church, however they have been the one sport on the town in New England. They tried to provide you with a Puritan rationalization of their legitimacy. They failed fully. By the point of Solomon Stoddard, who created the midway covenant, they knew it.
Wait a minute. Is election, which is a requirement for the church—are you able to cross that on to your youngsters? Effectively, no person may determine that one out. And so by the point of Jonathan Edwards, it collapsed. However what didn’t collapse was this fixed motion westward of all these individuals who needed to survive. In order that they needed to come into some sort of alignment with actuality or existence, and that’s what fashioned the American character. And I’m saying the basic instance of that is Daniel Boone, who began off life as a Quaker. How are you going to maneuver into Indian territory as a Quaker? So what occurred is that he needed to modify this ridiculous—He needed to change his hat.
He needed to make a unique hat, a coonskin hat as an alternative of a Quaker hat.
He needed to decide up a gun. That’s what he needed to do. He needed to decide up a musket. So he’s a Quaker carrying a musket.
He needed to eat wild sport as an alternative of on the spot oatmeal Quaker oats.
I believe that that is what Emerson is making an attempt to do. He’s making an attempt to return to some sort of understanding of what’s occurring. I believe Paul Johnson known as him the primary American. He’s the primary American as a result of he’s understanding the mutation that needed to happen within the id of People, as a result of they’d a foundationless sect
Yeah, I believe you’re proper. That’s why he’s the actual thinker of the American Renaissance. However getting again to that subject of institutionalized faith that will get woven right into a social material stuffed with hypocrisy, after which authentically spiritual folks and particularly mystics search real spiritual expertise by purifying their souls…Let me shortly point out that Laurent Guyenot final evening on my present stated that I ought to ask you in regards to the starting of Protestantism, with Luther standing towards the promoting of indulgences, these “get-out-of-jail-free playing cards” absolving sins. Laurent stated “E. Michael Jones would have been on the aspect of Luther.” Is that true?
No, completely not. And secondly, in case you suppose indulgences triggered the Reformation, you’re a superficial thinker. And in case you suppose that Yahweh is the satan, you’re a blasphemer. And that’s the issue with Guyanaud’s evaluation. He’s crippled by Marcionism, okay? We’ve got to make a distinction between people who find themselves hypocrites and religions that are intrinsically hypocritical. Quakerism is by definition a hypocritical faith. Ben Franklin found this. There’s a passage within the autobiography. They’re crusing to Philadelphia and instantly a ship seems on the horizon and the captain says, “girls and kids beneath board, all able-bodied males take up a gun.” And one of many guys was a Quaker. And he picks up a gun as a result of they needed to defend themselves. And William Penn was one of many Quakers who goes down beneath board with the ladies and kids. It seems that it wasn’t a pirate ship. So afterwards, William Penn upbraids the Quaker for taking over a gun. And the Quaker stated “thou didst not complain when thou thought was a pirate ship.”
That is full hypocrisy baked into their faith, as a result of they wished to retain their property however they’d not defend it when it was threatened. And that’s the hypocrisy that’s institutional, that needed to go earlier than America may… And that’s what Daniel Boone discovered. And there’s a distinction there.
And to speak in regards to the Reformation both in England or in Germany with out speaking in regards to the avarice of the decrease aristocracy who merely wished to steal church property after which cook dinner up a theological justification after the actual fact is to not keep up a correspondence with actuality. There was hypocrisy on either side. Or possibly extra of it on the Protestant aspect. Look, hypocrisy shouldn’t be—there’s all the time hypocrisy, okay? It’s t he tribute that vice pays to advantage. So it’s all the time going to be right here.
That’s not the driving drive behind the Reformation in any respect.
Okay, after which simply in half protection of Marcionism, it does appear to me that among the ultraviolence across the American conquest of the Americas by the Puritans and all their numerous successors may be very fantastically captured in one of many greatest-ever American novels, Blood Meridian by Cormac McCarthy, which is type of laborious to learn. It’s so bloody. Some folks can’t go to motion pictures as a result of they’re too violent. Effectively, this can be a ebook that’s laborious to learn. Possibly one of many only a few books that I’ve ever learn that’s that arduous to learn. Nevertheless it echoes with Previous Testomony thunder and brimstone because it describes massacres.
You’re completely proper. The Puritans have been Judaizers. That implies that they went to the Previous Testomony for the fashions that allowed them to know the world, and certainly one of them they took away was Amalek. The Jews are nonetheless speaking this manner about Palestinians. It’s a misinterpretation of the Previous Testomony, like Marcionism is a misinterpretation of the Previous Testomony, however it’s one which the Puritans had, and it characterised, it epitomized, and it directed their entire angle towards the Indians and the conquest of the Indians that was not shared by Catholic France and by Catholic Spain.
It is a purely English phenomenon. When the English confirmed up in Nova Scotia the Presbyterians stated, we’re bringing Christ to you folks. And at that time, the French had already intermarried with the Mi’kmaq for hundreds of years. They usually stated, no, we’re Catholic. Effectively, at that time, they stated, no, you’re not, as a result of Catholics are an abomination. And in case you don’t go together with this, there shall be penalties. After which they put bounties for scalping the French Micmac. And when that didn’t work, they shipped them off to Louisiana, the place they turned the Cajuns. That is the historic distinction between the Protestant angle towards the Indians and the Catholic angle towards the Indians. And in case you don’t perceive it, you don’t perceive historical past of the USA of America.
Effectively, the Protestants refused to intermarry with the Indians as a result of they seen them as goyim or a lesser race as a result of their Previous Testomony focus, and so on. They usually have been considerably extra genocidal, possibly because of the Previous Testomony’s genocidal facets: Amalek, for instance, to cite Bibi Netanyahu. However in the end, the principle distinction was the intermarriage, proper? The Catholics, particularly the Spanish, enslaved and massacred and looted the Native People each bit as a lot because the Protestants did.
Are you speaking about Cortez? It is a paradigmatic instance of the conquest of Mexico. It’s one of many best tales ever informed. And the actual fact of the matter was that the Aztecs had established this genocidal hegemony over each different Indian tribe in Mexico on the time, and they’d march them up the pyramids and reduce their hearts out. A regime like that isn’t going to go quietly. It needed to be introduced down by navy drive.
However lengthy after that, Indians, as a result of they have been out there to be captured as slaves, have been rounded up, made slaves, put to work within the mines of Potosi and different locations, labored to demise beneath horrific circumstances. General, as I perceive it, the atrocities dedicated by Catholics within the Americas have been in all probability at the very least as nice as these dedicated by Protestants.
I disagree. And even in case you’re speaking about particular person acts of injustice, you’re speaking about what occurred to the Mexican folks. The Mexican persons are the cosmic race due to Our Woman of Guadalupe. It is a truth of historical past. It’s not some pious Catholic fable. Her tilma is in Mexico, you possibly can take a look at it in order for you, at which level she appeared as a mestiza, which meant the intermarriage of the Spaniards and the indigenous folks.
I’m saying that is basically totally different than the angle that English Puritans had towards the indigenous folks. The Catholic Church in Mexico didn’t view Indians as Amalek. There’s a elementary distinction there.
I believe the Previous Testomony thumping Puritans did certainly share a few of that mentality with Bibi Netanyahu and his mates over in Occupied Palestine. Anyway, my pro-Emerson aspect—I don’t have any silly consistency about being completely pro-Emerson—I admit that you simply’re proper about a few of these issues, particularly his place in general mental historical past and what egotism, which individuals may draw from this essay, Self-Reliance, has led to. So, yeah, I’m nonetheless break up, similar to our picture right here suggests, with none silly consistency in any respect.
Any final ideas on Emerson and Cherchez le Juif?
Yeah, I believe we’re at a disaster as a result of we don’t know what it means to be an American. It’s vital for you and me to know what it means to be an American, as a result of we clearly come from totally different traditions, whether or not it’s the Emersonian Protestant or the Islamic custom. And we’ve got to have some sort of lingua franca that permits us to speak collectively as People. And I believe the one method that we’ve got to hammer out this subject proper now could be the Jewish management of our tradition. That is the problem that must be resolved. It must be resolved by People, for People, even when they differ when it comes to elementary points.
That’s the essence of what America was. The essence, we’ve got to have an ethical consensus, which is what John Adams stated. And which suggests we can not tolerate both abortion or Zionism. These are past the pale. This ought to be past political distinction. We must always have a unanimity. We’ve got to return again to this unanimity in assist of the ethical regulation, as a result of in any other case we’re going to finish up very badly. We’re already in unhealthy form and the long run appears to be like even gloomier.
Yeah, I agree with that. And so far as the Emanuel Todd’s declare that Protestant American tradition has collapsed, I believe that’s true. And to me, one of many higher sides of that Protestant American tradition is represented by Emerson. Possibly it’s a private factor for me, as a result of my grandmother, who was a little bit of a nature mystic—she was the one particular person with any spiritual sense in my household—was a Unitarian and a follower of Emerson and Thoreau. However whether or not it’s as a result of that type of partisanship that I inherited or my studying, I’ve discovered the Emerson aspect of American Protestantism had lots of constructive facets in comparison with the Jewish-dominated tradition that we’ve had since World Struggle II and particularly for the reason that coup d’etats that overthrew John F. Kennedy after which the coup d’etat on 9/11, which have been supreme expressions of the Jewish takeover of the USA from the Protestants.
So possibly we have to use that African proverb, “in case you’re misplaced, return to the place you have been earlier than you have been misplaced,” and say we have to return to the perfect of pre-World Struggle II Protestant-led America. I don’t know the place else we’re going to go. Possibly what we have to do is return there after which get on a camel. In different phrases, begin praying 5 occasions a day, begin seeking to the Quran for steerage, and submitting to God in islam, surrendering to God.
So if Emerson would simply get off that top camel and give up to God: “Get off that camel, Emerson, unfold out your carpet, and carry out sujood together with your brow on the earth!”
Self-reliance and Islam are fully incompatible. They’re the entire opposites. However you appear to have introduced them collectively in some miraculous method.
What I’m saying is that America must get again to its Emersonian virtues, after which “get off that top camel and put your brow on the ground.”
That’s the place we’re going to have to go away it. So thanks a lot, Michael Jones. At all times get pleasure from speaking with you throughout this huge gulf of cultures and religions that’s truly in all probability not even so far as Wisconsin to Indiana was, again once I was in Wisconsin. Trying ahead to much more dialog within the not too distant future, inshallah.
