‘We do have devoted cops who’re scouring social media to search for this materials, after which observe up with arrests.’
The director of public prosecutions of England and Wales warns that sharing on-line materials of riots may very well be an offencehttps://t.co/PYaeP7gPAQ pic.twitter.com/kOGWDPrlyz
— Sky Information (@SkyNews) August 7, 2024
🚨🇺🇸JOE ROGAN: UK’S SPEECH CRACKDOWN REMINDS ME OF SOVIET RUSSIA
“The truth that they’re snug with discovering individuals who’ve stated one thing that they disagree with and placing them in a f—king cage in England in 2024 is actually wild.
Particularly, they’re saying you may get… pic.twitter.com/r1nMOKZLZJ
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) August 9, 2024
In order it seems, folks had been rioting as a result of they noticed on-line faux information that stated immigrants are dangerous. Immigrants are literally good, however folks don’t know that, due to misinformation.
It’s doable that AI is accountable.
Keir Starmer has stated ministers will assessment on-line misinformation legal guidelines after a spreading of falsehoods contributed to this month’s far-right riots.The prime minister stated social media was “not a law-free zone” throughout a go to to a police station on Friday.
What?
He was requested about remarks made by the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, that the On-line Security Act was not match for objective and wanted to be revisited.Requested whether or not he agreed with Khan, Starmer instructed broadcasters: “I do agree that we’re going to must look extra broadly at social media after this dysfunction, however the focus in the meanwhile needs to be on coping with the dysfunction and ensuring that our communities are protected and safe.”
Beneath the On-line Security Act 2023, we now have a “false communications” offence so as to add to the plethora of speech-policing legal guidelines we already had. One other fantastic legacy of these freedom-loving Tories. pic.twitter.com/elFtBAdHgO
— Tom Slater (@Tom_Slater_) August 9, 2024
There have been requires the On-line Security Act, which empowers the media regulator to nice social media platforms that fail to deal with disinformation, to be enforced extra shortly.On social media, the prime minister stated: “The very first thing I’d say is, this isn’t a law-free zone. And I believe that’s clear from the prosecutions and sentencing. Right now we’re due sentencing for on-line behaviour.”
I don’t truly perceive what that sentence means.
“That’s a reminder to everybody that whether or not you’re straight concerned or whether or not you’re remotely concerned, you’re culpable, and you’ll be put earlier than the courts should you’ve damaged the regulation. And in order that’s taking place immediately, that sentencing.”Khan instructed the Guardian on Thursday: “I believe very swiftly the federal government has realised there must be amendments to the On-line Security Act. I believe what the federal government ought to do in a short time is verify whether it is match for objective. I believe it’s not match for objective.”
I hate to say this, however: you may’t have a liberal democracy and in addition say that info is “unsafe.”
It’s attention-grabbing that the US calls it the “Children On-line Security Act,” whereas the UK drops the “youngsters” and simply says that adults are unsafe if they’ve free entry to info. The US and UK variations are principally the identical factor – complete web censorship.
This regulation was already being pushed earlier than the riots, now they’re justifying it. There’s probably not any method to censor British folks any greater than they already are, however with this apparently they will sue Twitter and Fb for not censoring sufficient.
The British have began a serious crackdown on web posting.
BREAKING: 595 folks have been arrested and practically 160 have been charged in reference to the UK riots, the Nationwide Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) has confirmed.
Our correspondent @Mollie_Malone1 has the most recent.https://t.co/WED4GwQDMU
📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 pic.twitter.com/4lSRxquLdn
— Sky Information (@SkyNews) August 9, 2024
BREAKING: A social media consumer from Flintshire has turn out to be the primary particular person in Wales to be convicted in relation to the UK riots.
Richard David Williams, 34, pleaded responsible to 1 rely of sending menacing messages through a public communication community.
Dwell: https://t.co/GomaGMNHgZ pic.twitter.com/vYemdHp8K3
— Sky Information (@SkyNews) August 9, 2024
BREAKING: Jordan Plain, 30, has been jailed for eight months after pleading responsible to racially aggravated intentional harassment in Leeds amid riots.
Sky’s @RLCotterill has extra from outdoors courtroom on this sentence.https://t.co/URKZJQHkDi
📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 pic.twitter.com/5E5vr0TN3z
— Sky Information (@SkyNews) August 9, 2024
BREAKING: Tyler Kay, 26, has been jailed for 38 months at Northampton Crown Court docket after stirring up racial hatred utilizing social media.
He wrote a submit on X calling for motels housing asylum seekers to be set alight.
Newest: https://t.co/mHMpgmaass
📺 Sky 501 and Freeview 233 pic.twitter.com/f7QdkhZwqW
— Sky Information (@SkyNews) August 9, 2024
BREAKING: Jordan Plain, 30, has been jailed for eight months after pleading responsible to racially aggravated intentional harassment.
The decide stated Plain’s behaviour was “designed to fire up racial hatred at a time of heightened social pressure”
Dwell: https://t.co/mHMpgmaass pic.twitter.com/gqjLw4kJU0
— Sky Information (@SkyNews) August 9, 2024
BREAKING: Jordan Parlour, 28, from Leeds has been jailed for 20 months for publishing written materials on Fb supposed to stir racial hatred amid riots.
Comply with stay updates: https://t.co/6kWl2txtVW
📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 and YouTube pic.twitter.com/4UwKCkkdB5
— Sky Information (@SkyNews) August 9, 2024
We’ll see how that works for them.
For the file: it is a lot extra censorship than ever existed within the USSR. It’s probably not a very good comparability.
Within the USSR, you simply weren’t allowed to be in opposition to the federal government. Within the trendy West, you aren’t allowed to be in opposition to something in any respect. You could be in opposition to there not being sufficient homosexual intercourse or abortions. However that, my buddy, is a double unfavorable. It simply means you’re for extra homosexual intercourse and abortions.
I assume you could be in opposition to white folks. Possibly you could be in opposition to heterosexuality, broadly. You could be in opposition to Russia, China, and Iran. I can’t actually consider anything you could be in opposition to.
Mainly, the one authorized assertion is: “I believe the federal government needs to be doing extra of what it’s doing proper now!”
