Previously:
It’s still not clear what the purpose of the drone hoax is, actually.
Chuck Schumer has to go out and say he’s against it, but as we’ve said repeatedly, there is simply no way that the government doesn’t know what these drones are.
AP:
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer was blocked Wednesday from quickly advancing a bill that would allow local law enforcement agencies to track aerial drones, ensuring Congress won’t act this year on the mysterious drone sightings that have bewildered residents of New Jersey and across the eastern U.S.Schumer, a New York Democrat, sought to speed a bipartisan bill through the Senate by seeking unanimous consent on the floor, but Sen. Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican, objected to its passage.
“The people in New York and New Jersey have a lot of questions, and they’re not getting good enough answers,” said Schumer. “The utter confusion surrounding these drone sightings shows that the feds can’t respond all on their own.”
Schumer has also called for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to deploy better drone-tracking technology to identify the drones and their operators.
The Senate bill would have also enhanced some federal agencies’ authority to act on drones, as well as started a pilot program to allow states and local authorities to disrupt, disable or seize a drone without prior consent of the operator.
The claim these drones are looking for some kind of stolen nuclear bomb or something has gained traction in recent days, particularly after it was promoted by Joe Rogan, but that only makes sense if you’re not willing to suppose that the US government would just fuck with people on purpose.
Schumer’s thing is probably about taking away people’s drone rights, and done in a way to make it look to the people of New York like he’s trying to stop the drone swarm.
Frankly, it doesn’t really seem like people care very much about this drone hoax. The media and various government officials are acting like people care about it, but I’ve not seen one normal person saying “SOMEONE HAS TO STOP THESE DRONES.”
Most people understand that they are drones, not some secret technology, they understand that the only people who could be doing it are in the US government, and it’s just difficult to get overly upset over that.
I saw Dan Bongino on stream trying to say these were from “a foreign adversary” and he asked the chat and the chat flipped out and said they were from the US government, at which point he backed off the claim.
Remember that with the China “spy balloon” hoax, China was demanding that the US bring down the balloon and open it up and provide evidence for their claims it was a “spy balloon.” Instead of doing that, Joe Biden let it float all the way across the country, then used a very expensive missile to destroy it over the ocean so no one could ever know what it was.
That was a total hoax, and it is disgusting that Tucker Carlson promoted it.
But that is what people are using to support the claim that the US government would allow China/Russia/Iran drones to swarm over New Jersey for literally no reason. There is no way they would allow that, and they would use it as a reason to attack any of these countries – all of which the Biden Administration has already declared some form of war against.
As Jeffrey Sachs said in his most recent interview with Tucker Carlson, many “conservatives” are attempting to say that we shouldn’t have a war with Russia because it is draining resources we need for a war with the Chinese.
Tucker didn’t push back and defend his anti-Sinoese agenda, because he knows he would be made to look like a complete moron who is pushing a total hoax against the innocent Sinoese people, who have no desires beyond delivering high-quality products at reasonable prices.
That interview is worthwhile by the way. At least if you’re not familiar with Sachs’ talking points.
The moment where Tucker refuses to defend his own moronic pro-war views is very funny.
- If his views are legitimate, he should be able to defend them.
- Why would China, which has hundreds of spy satellites, send a balloon?
- Why should America spent billions to protect gay sex in Taiwan, an internationally recognized Chinese territory?
- Why would China want a war against America? What could possibly be the purpose?
- If China is planning a war with America, why is there no evidence of developing weapons for that purpose? Why are they only developing short and medium range weapons to be used if/when the US starts a war in the Pacific?
These and many more are valid questions which Tucker Carlson totally refuses to answer.
Someone should pressure him into the conversation, but there is no one who can do that. Especially when he backs down like a little bitch when his own interviewees speak out against his violent anti-Sino agenda.
