Within the UK, Islamophobia is so bipartisan, so normalised, that BBC reporters discuss with anti-Muslim pogromists as ‘pro-British protesters’
Think about this scene, if you happen to can. For a number of days, violent mobs have massed within the centre of British cities and clashed with police in an try to achieve synagogues to assault them.
Draped in England flags and Union Jacks, and armed with cricket bats and steel rods, the trouble-makers have dismantled backyard partitions to throw bricks.
Gangs have swept via residential areas the place Jews are identified to stay, smashing home windows and making an attempt to interrupt down doorways. The rioters attacked and torched a lodge recognized as housing Jewish asylum seekers, an act that might have burned alive the occupants.
For days, the media and politicians have mainly referred to those occasions as far-right “thuggery” and spoken of the necessity to restore legislation and order.
Within the midst of all this, a younger Jewish MP is invited onto a significant morning TV present to speak concerning the unfolding occasions. When she argues that these assaults should be clearly recognized as racist and antisemitic, one of many present’s presenters barracks and ridicules her.
Shut by, two white males, a former cupboard minister and an govt at one of many UK’s largest newspapers, are seen overtly laughing at her.
Oh, and if this isn’t all getting too fanciful, the TV presenter who mocks the younger MP is the husband of the house secretary accountable for policing these occasions.
Take a look at how @edballs & @kategarraway deal with @zarahsultana.
So hostile.
— James Foster (@JamesEFoster) August 5, 2024
The situation is so hideously outrageous nobody can conceive of it. However it’s precisely what occurred final week – besides that the mob wasn’t focusing on Jews, however Muslims; the younger MP was not Jewish however Zarah Sultana, the nation’s most high-profile Muslim MP; and her demand was not that the violence be recognized as antisemitic however as Islamophobic.
All of it sounds much more believable now, I’m guessing. Welcome to a Britain that wears its Islamophobia proudly, and never simply on the streets of Bolton, Bristol or Birmingham, however in a London TV studio.
‘Professional-British protests’
Islamophobia is so bipartisan in in the present day’s Britain that BBC reporters on a minimum of two events referred to the mobs chanting anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant slogans as “pro-British protesters“.
BBC reporter has simply described rioters as “a pro-British march” pic.twitter.com/IR8695kGWF
— Ted Sales space (@tedgbooth) August 4, 2024
The chief focus of nightly information has not been the anti-Muslim racism driving the mob, or the resemblance of the riots to pogroms. As an alternative, it has highlighted the bodily threats confronted by the police, the rise of the far-right, the violence and dysfunction, and the necessity for a agency response from the police and courts.
The set off for the riots was disinformation: that three small ladies stabbed to dying in Southport on 29 July had been killed by a Muslim asylum seeker. In truth, the suspected killer was born in Cardiff to Rwandan mother and father and isn’t Muslim.
However politicians and the media have contributed their very own types of disinformation.
Media protection has principally assisted – and echoed – the rioters’ racist agenda by conflating the violent focusing on of long-settled Muslim communities with common issues about “unlawful” immigration. The reporting has turned “immigrant” and “Muslim” into synonyms simply as readily because it earlier turned “terrorist” and “Muslim” into synonyms.
And for a lot the identical motive.
In doing so, politicians and the media have as soon as once more performed into the fingers of the far-right mob they’re seemingly denouncing.
Or seen one other method, the mob is taking part in into the fingers of the media and politicians who declare they need calm to prevail whereas persevering with to fire up tensions.
Muslim youth who turned out to defend their houses, as police struggled to deal with the onslaught, have been labelled “counter-protesters.” It was as if this was merely a conflict between two teams with conflicting grievances, with the police – and the British state – caught within the center.
Once more, can we think about rioting, hate-filled pogromists making an attempt to burn alive Jews being described as “protesters,” not to mention “pro-British?”
None of this has come out of nowhere. The present anti-Muslim temper has been stoked by either side of the political aisle for years.
The British institution has each incentive to proceed channelling public anger over financial points – akin to shortages of jobs and housing, crumbling companies and the rocketing price of residing – onto scapegoats, akin to immigrants, asylum seekers and Muslims.
Had been it not doing so, it may be a lot simpler for the general public to determine who’re the true culprits – an institution that has been pushing infinite austerity insurance policies whereas siphoning off the widespread wealth.
‘Abusive relationship’
The case in opposition to the proper is well made.
Sayeeda Warsi, a Conservative peer and former cupboard minister, has been warning for greater than a decade that her get together is crammed with Muslim-hating bigots, amongst each the broader membership and senior officers.
She declared again in 2019: “It does really feel like I’m in an abusive relationship for the time being… It’s not wholesome for me to be there any extra with the Conservative get together.”
A current ballot discovered that greater than half of Tory get together members imagine Islam is a risk to what was termed a “British lifestyle” – far above the broader public.
Such racism stretches from the highest to the underside of the get together.
Boris Johnson, whose novel Seventy-Two Virgins in contrast veiled Muslim ladies to letterboxes, received endorsement in his prime ministerial run from far-right figures akin to Tommy Robinson, who has been fomenting the present wave of riots from a Cyprus hideaway.
Warsi was particularly crucial of Michael Gove, one of many key actors in successive Conservative governments. She noticed: “I feel Michael’s view is there isn’t a such factor as a non-problematic Muslim.”
Which will clarify why the get together has repeatedly refused to handle confirmed and rampant Islamophobia inside its ranks. For instance, officers quietly reinstated 15 councillors suspended over excessive Islamophobic feedback as soon as the furore had died down.
Even when the management was ultimately cornered into agreeing to an impartial inquiry into anti-Muslim bigotry within the get together, it was rapidly watered down, changing into a “common inquiry into prejudice of all types.”
‘Swarm flooding UK’
In February, shortly after Lee Anderson stepped down because the Conservative get together’s deputy chairman, he declared that “Islamists” had “acquired management of” Sadiq Khan, London’s mayor. The mayor, Anderson added, had “given our capital metropolis away to his mates.”
He was suspended from the Tory parliamentary get together when he refused to apologise. However even then, Tory leaders, together with the then-prime minister, Rishi Sunak, and his deputy, Oliver Dowden, refused to label Anderson’s feedback as racist or Islamophobic.
Dowden steered solely that Anderson had used the “incorrect phrases.”
Sunak ignored Anderson’s inflammatory, hate-filled rhetoric altogether, redirecting public ire as a substitute in the direction of marches in opposition to Israel’s slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza – or what he described as a supposed “explosion in prejudice and antisemitism”.
Anderson quickly defected to the much more aggressively anti-immigrant Reform get together of Nigel Farage.
Suella Braverman, a former house secretary, equally proclaimed: “The reality is that the Islamists, the extremists and the antisemites are in cost now.”
Rightwing media, from GB Information to the Each day Mail, have often echoed such sentiments, evaluating immigrants – invariably implied to be Muslims – as a “swarm” flooding Britain’s borders, taking away jobs and housing.
The appropriate wing press needs to be held accountable for inciting hatred and violence.
RT if you happen to agree. pic.twitter.com/ovHdPTW0Nu
— Harry Eccles (@Heccles94) August 3, 2024
Even the physique charged with figuring out and defending ethnic minorities made an all-too-obvious exception within the case of institutional Islamophobia.
The Equality and Human Rights Fee had been solely too eager to research the Labour Celebration over what turned out to be largely evidence-free claims of antisemitism in opposition to its members.
However the identical physique has steadfastly refused to hold out an identical investigation into well-documented Islamophobia within the Tory Celebration, regardless of receiving a file from the Muslim Council of Britain containing allegations of bigotry from 300 figures within the get together.
‘Cease the boats’
Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer is now main a high-profile crackdown on the violence of the far-right by organising a “standing military” of anti-riot police squads and urgent for fast and hard sentencing.
His supporters trumpeted his success in his first main check as prime minister final week, when anticipated riots final Wednesday did not materialise.
However since changing into Labour chief 4 years in the past, Starmer has performed a direct position in fuelling the anti-Muslim local weather, too, a local weather that inspired the far-right out onto the streets.
In his marketing campaign for No 10, he made a acutely aware choice to compete with the Tories on the identical political terrain, from “unlawful immigration” to patriotism and legislation and order.
That political terrain was formed by a New Labour overseas coverage 20 years in the past that has had far-reaching home repercussions, stigmatising British Muslims as un-British, disloyal and liable to terrorism.
In lockstep with america, the Labour authorities of Tony Blair waged a brutal, unlawful battle on Iraq in 2003 that left greater than 1 million Iraqis lifeless and plenty of tens of millions extra homeless. Nonetheless extra have been dragged off to black websites to be tortured.
Together with a violent and extended occupation of Afghanistan by the US and UK, the Iraq invasion triggered regional chaos and spawned new and nihilistic types of Islamist militancy, notably within the type of the Islamic State group.
Blair’s brutalising campaign within the Center East – usually framed by him as a “conflict of civilisations” – was certain to alienate many British Muslims and radicalise a tiny variety of them into an identical nihilism.
In response, Labour launched a so-called Stop technique that cynically centered on the risk from Muslims and conflated a completely explicable disenchantment with British overseas coverage with a supposedly inexplicable and inherently violent tendency inside Islam.
Starmer modelled his personal management on Blair’s and recruited a lot of the identical advisors.
Because of this, he was quickly obsessively aping the Conservatives in a bid to win again the so-called Pink Wall vote. The lack of city areas of northern England within the 2019 common election to the Tories was largely all the way down to Labour’s muddled place on Brexit, for which Starmer was mainly accountable.
Starmer tacked firmly rightwards on immigration, chasing after the Conservative Celebration because it veered even additional to the proper in its try to go off an electoral insurgency from Farage’s Reform Celebration.
As opposition chief, Starmer echoed the Tories in fixating on “stopping the small boats” and “smashing the smuggling gangs”. The subtext was that the migrants and asylum seekers fleeing the very troubles the UK had infected within the Center East have been a risk to Britain’s “lifestyle”.
It was a reinvention of the “conflict of civilisations” discourse Blair had championed.
Days earlier than polling in final month’s common election, Starmer went one additional, selling dog-whistle racism of the sort extra often related to the Tories.
The Labour chief singled out Britain’s Bangladeshi group as one the place he would act extra decisively in finishing up deportations. “In the mean time, folks coming from international locations like Bangladesh will not be being eliminated,” he instructed an viewers of Solar readers.
Struggle on the left
However there was one other, much more cynical motive Starmer made racial and sectarian politics central to his marketing campaign. He was determined not solely to win over the Tory vote however to crush the Labour left and its political agenda.
For many years, Jeremy Corbyn, his predecessor, had been celebrated by the Labour left – and reviled by the Labour proper – for his anti-racist politics and his assist for anti-colonial struggles akin to that of the Palestinians.
For his troubles, Corbyn was roundly smeared by the British political and media institution in each method doable. But it surely was the cost of antisemitism – and its conflation with something greater than the mildest criticism of Israel – that proved probably the most damaging.
The identical Equality Fee that resolutely refused to research the Tories over Islamophobia hurried to bolster the smears of Corbyn’s Labour Celebration as institutionally antisemitic, though the physique struggled to provide any proof.
With the chameleon-like Starmer, it’s tough to divine any sure political convictions. However it’s clear he was not going to danger going through the identical destiny. The get together’s leftwingers, together with Corbyn, have been hurriedly purged, as was something that smacked of a left agenda.
Starmer turned a rabid cheerleader for Nato and its wars, and a champion of Israel – even after 7 October, when it lower off meals and water to the two.3 million folks of Gaza in what the world’s highest court docket would quickly be calling a “believable” genocide.
By then, Starmer’s battle on the left and its politics was well-advanced.
‘Menace’ snuffed out
The character of that factional assault was already clear in April 2020, shortly after Starmer had taken over Labour’s reins, when an embarrassing inner get together report was leaked.
Amongst many different issues, it confirmed how, throughout Corbyn’s management, the Labour proper had sought to break him and his supporters utilizing antisemitism smears because the weapon of alternative.
Nonetheless discovering his ft as chief, and making an attempt to go off an inner revolt over the revelations, Starmer appointed Martin Forde KC to hold out an impartial evaluation of the leak.
After lengthy delays, largely attributable to obstructions from get together officers, Forde printed his findings in the summertime of 2022. He recognized what he referred to as a “hierarchy of racism”, through which the Labour proper had sought to weaponise antisemitism in opposition to the left – together with in opposition to its Black and Asian members.
Maybe not surprisingly, Labour members from ethnic minorities are likely to share extra political floor with Corbyn and the Labour left, particularly of their sturdy opposition to racism and the decades-long colonial oppression of the Palestinians.
That was seen by the Labour proper and Starmer as a risk – and one they have been decided to snuff out.
An Al Jazeera documentary broadcast in September 2022, drawing on extra paperwork than Forde had managed to safe, found rampant Islamophobia from Starmer’s officers and the Labour proper.
One of many victims of Starmer’s purges of the left described to the programme-makers Labour’s current years as a “legal conspiracy in opposition to its members”.
Al Jazeera’s investigation discovered that Muslim get together members, together with native councillors, had been firmly within the Labour proper’s crosshairs.
Celebration officers have been revealed to have colluded in concealing law-breaking, covert surveillance and information assortment on Muslim members, as a prelude to suspending your complete London constituency of Newham, apparently as a result of there have been issues about it being dominated by the native Asian group.
Ethnic minority employees within the Labour head workplace who raised complaints about these discriminatory actions have been dismissed from their jobs.
Labour continued its seen purges proper as much as the July common election, cynically excluding and eradicating leftwing, Black and Muslim candidates on the final minute, so there could be no time to problem the choice.
The best-profile sufferer was Faiza Shaheen, an economist who had already been chosen because the parliamentary candidate for Chingford and Woodford Inexperienced till she was ditched very publicly and unceremoniously. Questioned concerning the choice, Starmer stated he wished solely the “highest high quality candidates”.
The same marketing campaign to humiliate and undermine Diane Abbott, the primary black girl MP and a Corbyn ally, dragged on for weeks earlier than being resolved begrudgingly in her favour.
The hardly veiled insinuation but once more was that Muslim and Black candidates couldn’t be trusted, that they have been suspect.
Notably too, it later emerged that Starmer’s officers had despatched a threatening authorized letter to Forde after he had spoken to Al Jazeera about racism throughout the get together. Forde concluded it was a barely veiled try to “silence” him.
Shortly after profitable an amazing parliamentary majority on one among Labour’s lowest-ever ever vote-shares, Starmer successfully suspended a handful of leftwing MPs from the parliamentary get together – as he earlier had accomplished to Corbyn. Their offence was voting to finish little one poverty.
Most seen was Zarah Sultana, the younger Muslim MP who had been barracked and jeered on Good Morning Britain for arguing that the riots wanted to be recognized as Islamophobic.
Harmful conflation
Although it has been extensively understood that Starmer was decided to crush the Labour left, the inevitable penalties of that coverage – particularly in relation to giant sections of Britain’s Muslim inhabitants – have been far much less examined.
One of many methods Starmer distanced himself from Corbyn and the left was to echo Israel and the British proper in redefining anti-Zionism as antisemitism.
That’s, he has smeared those that take the identical view because the judges of the World Courtroom that Israel is an apartheid state and one which has assigned Palestinians inferior rights based mostly on their ethnicity.
He has additionally vilified those that imagine Israel’s slaughter in Gaza is the logical endpoint for a racist apartheid state unwilling to make peace with the Palestinians.
Two teams specifically have felt the complete drive of this conflation of opposition to Israel’s crimes in opposition to the Palestinians – specifically, anti-Zionism – and antisemitism.
One is Labour’s leftwing Jews. The get together has assiduously tried to hide their existence from public view as a result of all of them too clearly disrupt its antisemitism narrative. Proportionally, the most important group expelled and suspended from Labour have been Jews crucial of Israel.
However conversely, and much more dangerously, Starmer’s conflation has served to visibly tar Muslims on the whole as antisemitic, provided that they’re probably the most vocal and united group in opposing Israel’s “believable” genocide in Gaza.
Starmer’s denunciations of anti-Zionists as Jew haters have – whether or not deliberately or not – readily bolstered a toxic caricature the Tories have been selling of Islam as a faith inherently hateful and violent.
Israel’s genocidal battle on Gaza over the previous 10 months – and the horrified reactions of tens of millions of Britons to the slaughter – has introduced the issue with Starmer’s method into particularly sharp aid.
The Labour chief might have eschewed the incendiary rhetoric of Braverman, who denounced as “hate marches” the mass, peaceable protests in opposition to the slaughter. However he has subtly echoed her sentiments.
In rejecting the left’s anti-racism and anti-colonialism, he has needed to prioritise the pursuits of a genocidal overseas state, Israel, over the issues of Israel’s critics.
And to make his stance seem much less ignoble, he has tended, just like the Tories, to gloss over the various racial composition of these opposing the slaughter.
Loyalty check
ORDER IT NOW
The objective has been to attempt to discredit the marches by obscuring the truth that they’ve multiracial assist, that they’ve been peaceable, that many Jews have taken a distinguished half and that their message is in opposition to genocide and apartheid and in favour of a ceasefire.
As an alternative, Starmer’s method has insinuated that home Muslim extremists are shaping the character of the protests via chants and behavior which might be prone to make Jews fearful.
The Labour chief has claimed to “see hate marching aspect by aspect with requires peace, individuals who hate Jews hiding behind individuals who assist the simply reason for a Palestinian state”.
It’s a lawyerly, coded model of the racist proper’s “Londonistan” – the supposed takeover of the UK’s capital by Muslims – and the smears, now even from authorities advisors, that the weekly marches in solidarity with Gaza’s struggling are turning British cities into “no-go zones” for Jews.
Starmer’s phrases – whether or not by design or not – have breathed life into the racist proper’s preposterous allegation of “two-tier policing”, through which the police are supposedly so afraid to tackle the Muslim group that the far-right must do their job for them.
The truth of that two-tier policing was solely too seen final month when a video confirmed a police officer stamping on the pinnacle of a tasered and inert Muslim man after a fracas at Manchester airport. The person’s brother was proven being assaulted whereas his fingers have been behind his head, and their grandmother studies having been tasered too.
As with the Tories, Starmer’s unstinting assist for Israel since 7 October – and his framing of protests in opposition to the slaughter as threatening to Jewish communities – has created an undeclared, implicit loyalty check. One which assumes most British Jews are patriots whereas casting suspicion on British Muslims that they should show they aren’t extremists or potential terrorists.
Each the primary events seem to imagine it’s fantastic for British Jews to cheerlead their co-religionists in Israel because the Israeli military bombs and starves Palestinian youngsters in Gaza – and even that there’s nothing incorrect with a few of them heading to the Center East to take a direct half within the killing.
However the two events additionally insinuate that it could be disloyal for Muslims to march in solidarity with their co-religionists in Gaza, at the same time as they’re being butchered by Israel, or vociferously oppose many years of belligerent Israeli occupation and siege that the world’s highest court docket has dominated are unlawful.
In different phrases, Starmer has tacitly endorsed a logic that views the waving of a Palestinian flag at an illustration as extra harmful and alien to British values than becoming a member of a overseas military to commit mass homicide – or, allow us to observe, than sending weapons to that military for it to slaughter civilians.
Reclaiming the streets
There are indications that Starmer’s alienation of enormous components of the Muslim group – intimating that its views on Gaza equate to “extremism” – might have been intentional and designed to impress voters on the proper.
A “senior Labour supply” instructed reporters that the get together welcomed the resignation of dozens of councillors from Labour over Starmer’s feedback in assist of Israel ravenous Gaza’s inhabitants. It was, the supply stated, the get together “shaking off the fleas”.
A associated narrative was superior by Starmer loyalists ousted in final month’s common election by leftwing independents, together with Corbyn, operating on a platform to cease the slaughter in Gaza.
Jonathan Ashworth, who misplaced his Leicester South seat to Shockat Adam at July’s common election, accused supporters of his Muslim rival of failing to abide by democratic norms – via what Ashworth has termed “vitriol”, “bullying”, and “intimidation”.
No proof has been produced for his declare.
Palestinian flags have been all too seen at what politicians and the media have been calling “counter-demonstrations” – anti-fascists reclaiming the streets from the far-right, as they did final Wednesday.
The Labour proper, which like Starmer is eager to see the left disappear from British politics, had insisted that anti-racists keep at house to let the police cope with the racist rioters.
However it’s exactly as a result of the anti-racist left has been pressured onto the again foot via a bipartisan marketing campaign of smears – portray it as excessive, antisemitic, un-British, traitorous – that the racist proper has felt emboldened to point out who’s in cost.
Starmer is now decided to place the genie he helped launch again into the bottle via sheer brute drive, utilizing the police and courts.
There’s each motive to worry, given Starmer’s marketing campaign of smears in opposition to the left and authoritarian purges inside his get together, that his new authorities is greater than able to deploying the identical heavy hand in opposition to the so-called “counter-demonstrators”, nevertheless peaceable.
The Labour chief believes he reached energy by smearing and crushing the anti-racist left, by driving it into the shadows.
Now, as prime minister, he might but resolve it’s time to roll out the identical programme throughout the nation.
