The central technique of leftism may be very easy and really efficient. It runs like this: “Heads we win, tails you lose.” In pursuit and preservation of energy, leftists will distort, mutilate and censor actuality advert libitum. Or they may merely lie. When the Black prison George Floyd induced his personal demise in 2020, the left responded with lethal riots and mendacity rhetoric in regards to the “murderous racism” of the police. When three little White women had been slaughtered by an imported Black savage in 2024, the leftist politician Humza Yousaf, former First Minister of Scotland, demanded one thing fully totally different:
Our solely response to the evil we witnessed in Southport yesterday ought to be an outpouring of grief for the youngsters and adults killed in such a mindless assault.In case you use such a horrific tragedy to gas bigotry, then you’re the worst of humanity. (Tweet by Humza Yousaf, thirtieth July 2024)
Yousaf calls for that Whites “thinka da paw ickle kiddies” – and do nothing greater than that. Leftists like him need grief to be the “solely response” as a result of grief is ineffective. It is not going to remedy the very significant issue of non-White violence towards Whites. Leftists don’t merely refuse to care about that drawback: they refuse to confess that it exists. It’s actual, in any case, and leftists don’t consider in realism. As a substitute, they consider in feelism, within the exploitation of emotion to advertise or shield leftist lies. When Quantity 10 Downing Road, the official residence of the British prime minister, was bathed in pink mild “to recollect the Southport victims,” the Labour authorities was utilizing feelism to guard leftist lies. When the Guardian revealed a cartoon of a wholly imaginary little lady, it was utilizing feelism to advertise leftist lies. Right here is the cartoon in query:
As Tom Sunić identified in a remark on the Occidental Observer: “Extreme sentimentality and hypermoralism are logos of the Liberal System.” The cartoonist Ben Jennings was dishonestly exploiting the innocence and helplessness of little women (be aware additionally the slender, unthreatening neck of the caring non-White father). His cartoon says: “Finka da paw ickle kiddies!” However in contrast to Humza Yousaf, Jennings desires much more than that. He’s not simply being sentimental, he’s additionally justifying the tough repression of the White working-class whom he sneers on the cartoon. It was his leftist response to the White riots of 2024 and to a violent assault on a resort housing so-called “asylum seekers” within the Yorkshire city of Rotherham. White women and girls have been raped, prostituted, tortured, and murdered by non-White Pakistani Muslims in Rotherham for many years. Jennings has by no means drawn any cartoons in regards to the rape-jihad in Rotherham or in regards to the homicide of three little White women in Southport. In spite of everything, the rapes and murders are actual.
As a substitute, he has drawn a cartoon about a wholly imaginary little lady. The resort in Rotherham was housing grownup male non-Whites. There have been no little women on the premises. If there had been, they’d have been at severe threat of molestation and rape by the non-White males. In spite of everything, these males come from probably the most misogynist and rape-friendly international locations on earth. If you wish to be taught extra in regards to the rape-culture and misogyny that flourish within the Third World, the Guardian itself is a superb supply. On the day after the newspaper revealed that cartoon about an imaginary non-White lady being menaced by White males, it revealed this story about actual non-White ladies being brutally harmed by non-White males:
She wished a divorce so her father hacked her legs with an axe: how Pakistan fails ladiesSobia Batool Shah is being protected in hospital after a mob of male kinfolk attacked her in a harrowing case that highlights Pakistan’s epidemic of gender-based violence
The family was quick asleep when the six males broke in. They sought out Sobia Batool Shah, 22, and one among them attacked her with a hatchet, chopping at her limbs in an effort to sever her legs. “He was relentless and should have hit me at the very least 15 instances,” she says. … Shah was attacked by males from her circle of relatives – together with her father, Syed Mustafa Shah, her uncle and cousins – who broke into the home, in Naushahro Feroze, in Pakistan’s Sindh province, as “punishment” for refusing to withdraw her utility to divorce her husband. …
“It’s all about energy management,” says Dr Summaiya Syed Tariq, chief police surgeon in Sindh’s capital, Karachi. Syed Tariq, who additionally heads the Sindh police medico-legal division, has seen lots of of girls bodily and mentally abused, raped, burned and murdered during the last 26 years. “We’re nurturing abusers who’re worse than animals,” she says.
On a mean day, the division receives stories of about six circumstances of sexual violence and 10 to fifteen circumstances of home violence throughout the medico-legal centres at three public hospitals in Karachi. “Within the case of sexual violence towards minors, my evaluation is that for each three circumstances that come to us, seven extra go unreported. And I’m not counting the useless our bodies that we obtain,” Syed Tariq provides.
Gender inequality is a world drawback, however Pakistan’s indicators replicate particularly alarming charges of disparities and violence confronted by ladies. In keeping with this 12 months’s World Financial Discussion board’s World Gender Hole report, Pakistan is ranked second from backside out of 146 international locations, behind solely Sudan. It ranked 164 out of 193 international locations on the 2023-24 UN gender inequality index. (“She wished a divorce so her father hacked her legs with an axe: how Pakistan fails ladies,” The Guardian, sixth August 2024)
To repeat: “Pakistan is ranked second from backside out of 146 international locations, behind solely Sudan.” Guess what? The Guardian had reported on Sudan just a few days earlier than. The headline ran like this: “Women as younger as 9 gang-raped by paramilitaries in Sudan.” The next report stated that “Among the assaults … had been so brutal that ladies and women died ‘because of the violence related to the act of rape’.” Each Pakistan and Sudan are non-White and Muslim. However what would occur should you informed a Guardian-reader that the Guardian’s personal reporting proves that immigration from Pakistan and Sudan can be very dangerous for White ladies in Britain? You’ll after all be denounced as a disgusting racist and Islamophobe.
In different phrases, you’ll be denounced as a realist, a hate-filled bigot who believes in basing his concepts on goal actuality reasonably than ego-feeding emotion. Leftists consider in feelism, not realism. King Charles III, or Chuck the Cuck as I want to name him, is a type of leftists preferring feelism to realism. He locations feeding his personal narcissism far above the welfare of his White topics. Certainly, he doesn’t care within the slightest in regards to the welfare of his White topics. In March 2023, the BBC reported how Chuck the Cuck had met “former refugees from [the] Sudanese group” and informed them “It’s been such a pleasure to satisfy you all — I’m so glad you’re protected right here.” Chuck the Cuck could be “glad” about Blacks invading Britain as a result of he doesn’t need to pay the prices of their presence. However a White lady needed to pay these prices in 2019. She practically died after her cranium was shattered throughout a brutal rape by a Sudanese enricher referred to as Zakarya Etarghi.
Raping White ladies delighted him
Among the many many causes that Blacks shouldn’t be residing in White nations is the stark undeniable fact that Black males commit sexual crimes at vastly disproportionate charges. Not solely that: they particularly goal White ladies, because the American Black Eldridge Cleaver (1935–1998) boasted means again in 1968:
Rape was an insurrectionary act. It delighted me that I used to be defying and trampling upon the white man’s regulation, upon his system of values, and that I used to be defiling his ladies – and this level, I consider was probably the most satisfying to me as a result of I used to be very resentful over the historic truth of how the white man has used the black lady. I felt I used to be getting revenge. From the positioning of the act of rape, consternation spreads outwardly in concentric circles. I wished to ship waves of of consternation all through the white race. (Quote from Cleaver’s Soul on Ice, 1968)
Black males have a real “rape tradition” directed at White ladies. However leftists in Nineteen Sixties America didn’t care in regards to the rape and homicide of White ladies by Black males. That will have been realism about Blacks and leftists had been involved solely with feelism about Blacks. Right here’s a definitive instance of that leftist feelism in one of many iconic pictures of the Civil Rights period:
Norman Rockwell slathers schmalz in The Drawback We All Dwell With (1964)
Norman Rockwell (1894-1978) was each a wonderful artist and a mendacity leftist. Like Ben Jennings’ cartoon, his portray dishonestly exploits the innocence and helplessness of little women. It says: “Finka da paw ickle kiddies!” To be truthful, Rockwell’s portray, in contrast to Jennings’ cartoon, was at the very least primarily based on an actual little lady, the now-sanctified Ruby Bridges (born 1954). However Bridges was in no way consultant of Blacks and the risk they posed to Whites. That’s exactly why Rockwell selected her, after all. She’s a helpless little lady who needs to be protected by massive law-enforcement officers from evil White racists. She simply desires to be taught, as you possibly can see from the ruler, pencils, and books she’s carrying. However that portrayal of Blacks as concurrently helpless and studious is a lie. It’s feelism, not realism. In actuality, Blacks are disproportionately violent and silly. The entry of Blacks into White faculties was a catastrophe for Whites and did nothing to enhance educational achievement amongst Blacks.
And though Rockwell’s portray was primarily based on feelism, it does include one component of realism. The big US marshalls replicate the truth of state drive. Whites didn’t need their faculties to be ruined by Blacks. However the state pressured desegregation on them whilst mendacity leftists like Norman Rockwell slathered schmalz over the method. Nor did Whites need their neighborhoods to be ruined by Blacks. Once more, the state pressured desegregation on them. And mendacity leftists like Norman Rockwell once more slathered schmalz. Right here’s one other of Rockwell’s dishonest pro-Black work:
Norman Rockwell slathers extra schmalz in New Children within the Neighborhood (1967)
Once more Rockwell makes use of a helpless little lady to propagandize for Blacks. Take a look at her in her pink gown and pink ribbons, along with her lovely little pig-tail. She’s no potential risk. And see the white cat she’s affectionately holding. She loves animals identical to the White youngsters dealing with her with their younger black canine. The whiteness of the cat and blackness of canine are symbolic, after all: the Black lady already loves one thing white even because the White youngsters already love one thing black. This time there’s a Black boy within the portray too, however he’s slender-necked and goofy-looking. He’s no risk both. He’s carrying a baseball glove, so he loves baseball identical to the White boy dealing with him in a baseball uniform. The Black and White youngsters are the identical beneath the pores and skin, united by their love of pets and baseball. Concord will certainly reign after the second of mutual uncertainty that Rockwell so charmingly captures.
That’s what the extremely dishonest portray says. In actuality, concord didn’t reign after Blacks moved into White neighborhoods. As a substitute, violent crime reigned. So did noise, vandalism, and street-strewn rubbish. In actuality, the goofy-looking Black boy within the portray would have been beating up the White boys and, inside a 12 months or two, raping the White lady. And the little Black lady would have been torturing the white cat, not treating it with affection. Abuse of animals is attribute of Blacks, not love of animals. However that’s realism about Blacks and leftists consider in feelism about Blacks. Nonetheless, there are two sides to leftist feelism. Recall Tom Sunić’s remark about how “Extreme sentimentality and hypermoralism are logos of the Liberal System.” He went on to level out that the sentimentality utilized solely to authorized teams, whereas the moralism justified any degree of violence towards unapproved teams: the Royal Air Drive and United States Air Drive “firebombed German cities throughout WWII – thought of lairs of nonhumans.”
You may see these two elements of leftism within the Guardian journalist Marina Hyde. She little doubt nodded with moist-eyed approval over Ben Jennings’ cartoon in regards to the imaginary little brown lady. However just a few years earlier than she had sniggered and joked in regards to the White nationalist Eugene Terreblanche being hacked to demise by Blacks in South Africa. Numerous different Guardianistas could have nodded with moist-eyed approval over the cartoon. And a few of them had been within the crowd that cheered, clapped, and laughed when the non-White Labour councillor Ricky Jones really helpful a strong response to the “the disgusting Nazi fascists” who don’t like little White women being slaughtered by Black savages. Jones stated: “We have to reduce all their froats [throats] and do away with ’em all.” He then paused to let the cheers and laughter die away earlier than main the group in a chant of “Free, free Palestine!” Right here’s a nonetheless from a video of the incident:
Observe the 2 White lady grinning with approval as they stand subsequent to the aspiring throat-cutter. The lady in glasses is sporting a tabard for Amnesty Worldwide, a self-proclaimed humanitarian group that’s resolutely against violence. Out of sight she’s holding one other of the SWP placards that say “SMASH FASCISM & RACISM By any means essential.” The SWP is the Socialist Staff Get together, a Trotskyist cult that hates White employees much more than the so-called Labour celebration does. When a senior male apparatchik within the SWP was accused of rape in 2010, the SWP responded not by reporting the matter to the police however by smearing the feminine accuser and clearing the male accused in a kangaroo courtroom.
As ever, you possibly can see that leftists are fascinated about solely two issues: pursuing energy and feeding their narcissism. They aren’t fascinated about serving to the teams they declare to care about. And they’re definitely not fascinated about serving to the White working-class. On this article I’ve mentioned a leftist drawing a saccharine cartoon a few non-existent little brown lady menaced by the White working-class. And I’ve mentioned one other leftist recommending that his comrades “reduce the throats” of the White working-class. These are the 2 complementary sides of one evil ideology: “Extreme sentimentality and hypermoralism are logos of the Liberal System.”
