Rumble hyperlink Bitchute hyperlink FFWN put up with hyperlinks and data on E. Michael Jones’ “Risks of Magnificence” convention
The world stands aghast because the genocidal Zionist entity lashes out in its dying throes, inflicting pointless mayhem on the civilians of Palestine and the management of Iran. And a collective international response is setting in. The Worldwide Felony Courtroom is searching for an arrest warrant for Netanyahu, the Worldwide Courtroom of Justice has ordered Israel to withdraw from Rafah, and European international locations are lining as much as be a part of the remainder of the world in recognizing the state of Palestine.
May the rebirth of the nation of Palestine coincide with, and signify, a re-emergence of morality in world affairs? That might be no small change. As False Flag Weekly Information co-host and Tradition Wars editor Dr. E. Michael Jones notes, the rulers of the Anglo-Zionist Empire imagine that “reality is the opinion of the highly effective”—and maintain the identical view of morality. That view will not be solely unfounded, since these rulers have lengthy loved ample energy to impose their variations of reality and morality on the world. If the Jewish-Protestant American empire is “a preacher with a gun,” as Dr. Jones says, it has been preaching lies at gunpoint a minimum of because it sanctified and immortalized conflict propaganda within the type of the sacred Holocaust narrative after World Warfare II.
With the demise of the Soviet Union in 1989, the empire’s capability to enshrine lies with pressure turned just about limitless. Reality and morality turned, for all sensible functions, regardless of the mendacity, immoral managers of empire stated they had been. Karl Rove famously mocked those that failed to note this transition as “the reality-based neighborhood” and boasted (little question with a nod and a wink to the absurdity of the official story of 9/11) that “we create our personal actuality now.” (And our personal morality with it, little question.)
The Zionists have gone the furthest in calling lies reality, and morality no matter they’ll get away with. Whereas planning and perpetrating genocide for greater than a century, and inflicting essentially the most sadistic, unspeakable, usually strategically superfluous tortures on anybody who will get of their approach, the Zionists have forged themselves as quintessential victims. That long-running ruse, nonetheless, has reached its expiration date. With the genocide of Gaza, the masks has come off. The psychopathic serial killer has been unveiled.
Although the neocon Zionists nonetheless management the US empire, that empire now not dominates the world the way in which it did only a decade in the past. The Zionists have run it into the bottom. By staging 9/11 because the PR launch for $7 trillion price of prison wars for Israel, the neocons hollowed out the US, rendering it morally in addition to fiscally bankrupt, and diverting its consideration from the financial rise of China, Russia, and different impartial powers.
So why will the rising multipolar world coincide with a return to morality? As a result of human beings are ethical creatures. Like many different animals solely extra so, people have an innate ethical sense and expertise shock, outrage, and the necessity to take motion when ethical norms are violated. These pure reactions could be briefly suppressed beneath sure circumstances, notably pathocratic tyranny. And that’s what we now have been dwelling beneath: the “absolute energy corrupts completely” regime of the self-styled unipolar hegemon. Because it comes aside, international energy will develop into a posh strategy of negotiation involving many stakeholders, who will commonly enchantment to the ethical sense of their negotiating companions and adversaries.
Revenge for the Gaza Genocide: What Would Zionist-Model “Proportionality” Look Like?
The necessity for negotiations primarily based on shared dedication to win-win outcomes, knowledgeable by common morality reasonably than tribal egotism, could also be illustrated by contemplating the choice: an infinite cycle of vengeance that includes ever-more-lethal applied sciences. Particularly, how may this play out within the Zionism-versus-Palestine battle?
Previous to the October 7 al-Aqsa Storm raid, Israel had been steadily killing Palestinians, by the 1000’s, for many years. Palestinian retaliation had been comparatively minor by comparability, inflicting lower than 10% of the deaths and casualties on Israelis that the Zionists had inflicted on them.
The Al-Aqsa Storm focus camp breakout killed about 1100 Israelis, roughly half of whom had been energetic navy, police, or safety. Israel responded by indiscriminately flattening most of Gaza. As I write, the official Gaza dying toll is over 36,000, which means our bodies extracted from rubble and recognized, whereas unofficial estimates of the full useless exceed 200,000. Nearly all of the Gaza victims are civilians, two thirds being ladies and youngsters.
As a conservative estimate, Israel’s genocidal “retaliation” has killed 60 instances as many civilians as died on October seventh (nearly all of whom had been in all probability killed by Israeli forces, not by Hamas). So if Palestine had been to “retaliate” in opposition to Israel in the identical approach that Israel “retaliated” in opposition to Palestine, by elevating the kill ratio by one other 6000%, it must kill a minimum of 2,160,000 Israelis.
And whereas the October 7 al-Aqsa Storm assault broken or destroyed a number of dozen Israeli buildings, Israel has fully destroyed nearly all of Gaza’s buildings—effectively over 150,000 in complete. That yields a ratio of someplace between 100,000 to 1 and 10,000 to 1. So for the Palestinians to “retaliate” in the identical approach the Israelis supposedly did, they must destroy a minimum of 1.5 billion Israeli buildings, way over exist. The one solution to come near inflicting that scale of retaliatory harm could be to raze Israel to the bottom after which nuke each main Western metropolis the place Jews stay. (Western Jews and their cities is perhaps thought-about professional targets as a result of the West props up Israel, the state of all Jews irrespective of the place they had been born.)
(Conventional) Morality vs. the Revenge Cycle
The worldwide anti-genocide pro-Palestine protests increase the prospect of invoking morality to cease the endlessly escalating revenge cycle. The scholars behind the largest campus protests because the Vietnam period don’t have anything to achieve, and far to lose, by taking a stand in opposition to the psychopathic genocidal killers who rule their declining civilization. But regardless of brutal repression by billionaire-incited police and thugs, and threats that they “won’t ever work on this city once more,” the scholars preserve protesting.
Fashionable communications know-how has allowed individuals to see issues their rulers would favor they didn’t, together with conflict crimes occurring on the opposite facet of the world. Younger individuals are starting to care about what occurs to far-away people their grandparents wouldn’t have observed. The 1948 Nakba (Palestinian holocaust) was little remarked on the time. Right this moment’s Nakba 2, the genocide of Gaza, has galvanized the world’s consideration, and nationwide insurance policies and worldwide establishments are slowly—too slowly—swinging into motion.
What many of the college students in all probability don’t understand is that common morality arguably depends upon specific religious and spiritual traditions. It’s the decline of these traditions that has introduced us a world of “something goes,” a world through which the sturdy can limitlessly prey on the weak and veil their crimes with lies. The neocon-run Anglo-Zionist empire’s try to make use of “inventive destruction” of religions, nations, and households to clear the way in which for one-world international tyranny has run up in opposition to the rising multipolar world, every pole of which calls for the fitting to its personal historic and spiritual identification. Iran and Russia are the 2 leaders in regard, however it might not be lengthy earlier than Confucian China and the non-Axis-of-Resistance Muslim international locations likewise rediscover their religious roots. (Western Christianity strikes me as too far gone, however E. Michael Jones would little question insist that with God’s permission something is feasible.)
Will anti-genocide college students comply with the trail blazed by individuals like E. Michael Jones, acknowledge that morality wants metaphysical grounding, and return to conventional faith? And if that’s the case, are all conventional religions equally viable?
Perennialism and the Center Japanese Monotheisms
Perennialist traditionalism holds that all the main revealed religions, and maybe even among the minor ones, present completely different expressions of the identical underlying common reality. Islam says a lot the identical factor, with the proviso that earlier religions had been imperfectly preserved and transmitted, so the one extant faith that’s well-preserved is…you guessed it…Islam.
As for Christianity, it has an excellent greater opinion of itself than Islam does. Conventional Christian doctrine, versus a few of its watered-down fashionable variants, doesn’t see itself as only one expression of an underlying reality, however as THE reality with out which salvation is well-nigh unimaginable.
One factor Muslims and Christians can agree on is that Jews—followers of the Hebrew scriptures who’ve rejected the common messages of Jesus and Mohammed—are problematic. The Qur’an repeatedly references Jews obstinately persisting in sin, rejecting the common message of the prophets (presumably preferring tribal and private self-interest): “O Jews! When you declare to be God’s chosen individuals out of all humanity, then want for dying, if what you say is true. However they may by no means want for that due to what their fingers have finished.” (62:6-7) The Jews are reluctant to satisfy their Maker, regardless that they declare to be “chosen,” as a result of they know, consciously or unconsciously, that they’ve lived unhealthy, egocentric lives and can face a harsh judgment. So that they flip away from eternity and focus as a substitute on the products of this world: “You shall certainly discover them extra avid for (the) life (of this world) than all different males…” (2:96)
The Quran typically views Christians positively and Jews negatively: “You’ll certainly discover essentially the most hostile in direction of the believers to be the Jews and polytheists and the closest to them in friendship those that name themselves Christian. That’s as a result of there are clergymen and monks amongst them and since they aren’t conceited.” (5:82) Much more strikingly, the Surah of Mary supplies a harsh rebuke to the Jews’ calumnies in opposition to Jesus and his holy mom.
However what concerning the oft-cited (by Jewish media) Sura 5:51: “O you who imagine! don’t take the Jews and Christians for pals/allies; they’re pals/allies of one another; and whoever amongst you takes them for a pal/ally, then certainly he’s one in all them; certainly Allah doesn’t information the unjust individuals.” Since this verse may appear to contradict 5:82 amongst others, and because the Qur’an states that it is freed from contradictions (4:82), the battle between 5:51 and different verses requires us to agree with Sheikh Imran Hosein’s interpretation that “Jews and Christians” ought to be bracketed collectively. In different phrases, “don’t take the [Jews and Christians] for pals/allies” implies that when [Jews and Christians] band collectively, because the Christian Zionists and self-styled Judeo-Christians do at this time, they’re the “unjust individuals,” as are those that ally with them.
Is It Nonetheless Authorized to Say That?
Is it nonetheless authorized to precisely summarize the Qur’an’s largely adverse view of Jews? In all probability. The Worldwide Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s Working Definition of Antisemitism, which governments are more and more utilizing to delegitimize and criminalize speech, doesn’t deal with the Qur’an’s critiques of Jews and Judaism. Nevertheless it does sanction “claims of Jews killing Jesus.” That provides Muslims, who imagine together with Christians that Jews plotted to kill Jesus, however are usually not positive they succeeded, a believable protection technique.
The Qur’an says the Jews
“had been condemned˺ for breaking their covenant, rejecting God’s indicators, killing the prophets unjustly, and for saying, ‘Our hearts are unreceptive!’—it’s God Who has sealed their hearts for his or her disbelief, so they don’t imagine aside from a number of—and for boasting, ‘We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of God.’ However they neither killed nor crucified him—it was solely made to look so. Even those that argue for this (crucifixion) are unsure. They don’t have any information in anyway—solely making assumptions. They definitely didn’t kill him.”
Although Qur’anic discourse on the crucifixion admits of varied interpretations, together with “the crucifixion like all evil was in some sense illusory, true actuality being the Resurrection,” it doesn’t straightforwardly accuse Jews of killing Jesus the way in which Christian doctrine does. As Dr. Jones defined throughout this week’s False Flag Weekly Information:
E. Michael Jones: Let’s be completely clear right here. Reduce to the chase.
St. Paul in Thessalonians says the Jews are the individuals who killed Christ and they’re enemies of the complete human race. There’s no theologian on this planet that may erase that from the Bible. It’s the basic pillar of the Catholic religion, of the Christian religion, and it’s there and it’s not going to alter. When St. Peter, within the Acts of the Apostles, walks into Jerusalem after Pentecost, he confronts the Jews and he says, “you killed Christ.”
What are these (IHRA-compliant) theologians pondering? That in some way we’re going to overlook that? That we will erase it? Effectively, truly, that’s what’s occurring.
Kevin Barrett: There are a whole lot of Bibles on the market. How are they going to do away with all of the Bibles? Go from motel room to motel room to do away with all of the Gideon Bibles?
E. Michael Jones: The purpose right here is now you’ve received these anti-Semitism consciousness acts which can be going to be pushed to mainly prosecute you in the event you quote the Bible. Now, that’s a step too far.
Our Protestant brothers all the time are quoting the Bible. There’s no jail sufficiently big to incarcerate all these individuals. And they also’re pushing the envelope to the purpose the place it’s going to backfire on them.
One thing comparable occurred with a Washington Submit story on Rabbi Solomon Friedman, who owns Pornhub. And the purpose of the article is, oh, effectively, then pornography have to be OK.
No, what we derive from that’s this. Your faith will not be worthy of the time period faith if one in all its basic sacraments is abortion and the opposite one is pornography.
So that you’re dropping credibility. You assume you’re successful the conflict. You win the battle and also you’re dropping the conflict. They don’t perceive this.
Palestine: Holy Land of two.5 Billion Christians, 2 Billion Muslims, and .015 Billion Jews
Of the world’s nearly 8 billion individuals, greater than half—roughly 4.5 billion—are common monotheists. They view morality as equally relevant to everybody.
Against this, one in all each 333 adherents of Center Japanese monotheism is a tribal monotheist. This vanishingly small fraction imagines itself to be “chosen by God” to lord it over the remaining. Their unstated slogan is “Our God Is Your God Too However He Has Chosen Us.” They maintain themselves to very completely different ethical requirements—vastly decrease ones. They shamelessly lie, cheat, steal, exploit, degrade, kill, and torture. However let one in all their victims a lot as increase a finger to defend himself, and so they scream bloody homicide. They proverbially cry out as they strike you.
This conceited, psychopathic tribe has arrogated the entire Holy Land to itself. Within the course of, it has by no means stopped planning and committing genocide.
However now the world’s 4.5 billion common monotheists, who’ve precisely the identical rights to the Holy Land because the world’s 15 million Jews, are poised to reclaim these rights—supported by the world’s different 3.5 million individuals, who’re turning into more and more universalist of their ethical outlook. Each time Israel threatens the conflict crimes prosecutor’s household, murders dozens of refugees in a tent metropolis in a “secure house,” intentionally murders support employees, journalists, and medical personnel, tortures youngsters, and wildly celebrates its personal deliberate murders of tens of 1000’s of youngsters, the world more and more realizes that the Jewish state is certainly “the enemy of all humanity.”
The rise of universalist Palestine instead of genocidal-tribalist Israel symbolizes the emergence of a common ethical order through which reality and morality are actual, not simply opinions of the highly effective…a world through which all the nations and tribes get to know each other and compete in doing good on an equal footing, resolving their variations in win-win negotiations reasonably than conceited hegemonic dictates primarily based on bogus claims of innate superiority.
