“Mid” is an apparent instance. As a time period, I don’t assume it even qualifies as teenage slang anymore — it’s too helpful and, by now, too widespread. In my son’s utilization, issues which can be “mid” are issues which can be primarily common or barely under. You possibly can’t actually complain about them however they produce no pleasure. They’re typically the results of the refinement of market analysis to the precise stage the place tepid client acceptance is achieved. Every thing in Starbucks falls into the class of “mid.” So does all the things in an airport. It’s an excellent, exact phrase for a world filled with gentle disappointments, the place the nook bakery that used to do some issues effectively and different issues poorly has been reliably changed by one more Le Ache Quotidien.
“Glazed” has a equally spectacular precision. When my son describes one thing as “glazed,” it’s meant to indicate not mendacity, precisely, and even exaggerating, however the act of positively spinning a judgment. “Glazed” signifies a gilding of data; sports activities commentary, for instance, is 90 % glaze. When Stephen A. Smith, the quintessential glazer, likens Anthony Edwards to Michael Jordan, a correct response could be “The Ant glazing is loopy.” However glaze can also be the proper description of the best way social media works: The world you encounter on-line is perpetually glazed, with all the things taking up an artificially optimistic, unreal and never solely reliable gloss.
There are different revealing phrases I’ve realized from my son: “Sus,” quick for suspicious or suspect, suggests a world that’s doubtful sufficient that you simply want a diminutive to explain it. “Cringe” is the proper catchall for that jarring model of performative sincerity that’s so frequent on-line. Younger individuals want diminutives to explain these realities; they’ve grow to be so commonplace.
However my favourite new slang phrase is “based mostly” — quick for “based mostly in truth” or “based mostly in actuality” and infrequently used as a time period of assent when somebody states a controversial opinion. “Canada ought to be part of the US,” one may say, to which another person may reply, “Primarily based.” It’s usually used for political topics however it might probably have a wider social utility: “Luka Doncic ought to be the M.V.P. of the N.B.A.” “Primarily based.”
Primarily based can have a extra malevolent connotation in sure alt-right circles, the place being based mostly alludes to allegiance to a contrarian viewpoint. However to my ear “based mostly” is an ideal phrase, a crucial phrase, to explain the informational chaos we inhabit. The truth that being based mostly in actuality now qualifies as a praise is proof that children like my son have come of age in a local weather the place misinformation, hype and fraud are so endemic that exceptions are notable. For them, to come across one thing based mostly in actuality is uncommon sufficient to deserve its personal distinct shorthand.
