Phrases don’t rule actuality, however they do manipulate minds. Take British politics. If honesty prevailed there, the Labour Social gathering can be renamed the Lawyer Social gathering. Thousands and thousands of its deluded supporters would lastly see the reality and cease voting for a celebration that hates them. Labour was based to advance the White working class, nevertheless it now abominates the White working class. This betrayal was brazenly admitted by the Jewish politician Lord Glasman in 2011:
Labour let in 2.2million migrants throughout its 13 years in energy — greater than twice the inhabitants of Birmingham. Lord Glasman, 49, had already informed BBC Radio 4 … “What you’ve got with immigration is the concept folks ought to journey all around the world searching for higher-paying jobs, typically to undercut present workforces, and one way or the other within the Labour Social gathering we bought right into a place that that was a superb factor. Now clearly it undermines solidarity, it undermines relationships, and within the scale that it’s been occurring in England, it may possibly undermine the opportunity of politics totally.”The educational, who directs the religion and citizenship programme at London Metropolitan College, criticised Labour for being “hostile to the English working class”. He mentioned: “In some ways [Labour] seen working-class voters as an impediment to progress. Their dedication to varied civil rights, anti-racism, meant that always working-class voters… had been seen as racist, resistant to vary, homophobic and customarily reactionary. So in some ways you had a horrible state of affairs the place a Labour authorities was hostile to the English working class.” (Miliband ally assaults Labour migration ‘lies’ over 2.2m they let in Britain, The Every day Mail, sixteenth April 2011)
By “English working class,” Glasman meant the “White working class.” Labour loathes White employees, not non-White employees. The get together ignores the far worse homophobia of lower-class Muslims and Blacks, as a result of they’re on the prime of the leftist racial hierarchy, not on the backside like Whites. Its angle in the direction of White employees will be summed up in a single easy phrase: “Vote for us, you scum.” In 2014 a wealthy Labour lawyer known as Emily Thornberry went to assist her get together’s candidate in a by-election at Rochester. She noticed a white workman’s van parked outdoors a home flying the English nationwide flag, the cross of St George. “Yuck!” she thought. So she took a photograph and despatched a silently sneering tweet.
Serve Jews or else!
Her chief, the reptilian Jew Ed Miliband, was very offended. He totally shared Thornberry’s contempt for White employees, in fact, however he hadn’t needed that contempt to be made public. In different phrases, he hadn’t needed the Labour Social gathering to be uncovered because the Lawyer Social gathering. Alas for Miliband, Thornberry’s vanity revealed the reality and helped UKIP win the by-election. It then helped the Conservative get together win three basic elections, first in opposition to Miliband, then in opposition to his substitute Jeremy Corbyn. When Corbyn was chief, he maintained Labour’s hostility to White employees. No-one in mainstream politics or media had any downside with that. However many politicians and journalists had very critical issues with Corbyn’s refusal to make Jewish pursuits his first and overwhelming precedence.
That’s why Corbyn was vilified as an anti-Semite and ultimately thrown out of the get together altogether. In 2024 Corbyn has simply gained his outdated constituency of Islington North standing as an unbiased. However the basic election itself was gained by Labour in a landslide underneath the fatuous and vacuous slogan of “Change.” Regular service has been resumed, as a result of the get together is as soon as once more headed by a lawyer, the slippery Sir Keir Starmer, and is as soon as once more devoted to serving Jewish pursuits. Like Emily Thornberry, the brand new Labour chief is a human rights lawyer; in contrast to Thornberry, he has efficiently hid his hatred and contempt for White employees. In the course of the election, the get together launched a exceptional propaganda video. Why was it exceptional? Easy. It was what the previous BBC apparatchik Greg Dyke would name “hideously white.” Starmer was proven at a junior faculty surrounded by youngsters and academics who had been uniformly stale and pale — there was not a black or brown face in sight, not a hijab or afro to be seen. Usually, in fact, all mainstream politicians like to be seen surrounded by non-Whites and non-White symbols. However not right here. At one level within the video, Starmer is seen giving the thumbs-up to an all-White class with a Union Jack on the wall behind him. At different factors, the flags of the House Nations — England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Eire — are seen over his shoulders.
Slippery Starmer slithers to supremacy
In different phrases, that video was deeply and intentionally dishonest. And each grownup taking part in it knew that it was a lie. The video was exploiting White youngsters to advance the reason for a celebration that’s devoted to destroying the way forward for White youngsters. Labour propagandists should have searched lengthy and arduous to discover a faculty like that. Actually, I wonder if the video was faked utilizing AI. These days, junior colleges up and down the nation are usually not uniformly White however swarming with Somalis and Syrians. And the flags on the partitions of school rooms are usually the crowded chromatics of the noble LGBTQIA+ group, not these of the House Nations. Starmer and his propagandists had been being significantly sly and slippery. He was making an attempt to fake to White employees that he and his get together aren’t implacably hostile to them and their love of nation.
He was mendacity, in fact, however sufficient White employees had been fooled to maintain Labour on monitor for its landslide. That’s one instance of Starmer’s slipperiness. One other instance was obvious when he was photographed proudly sporting the purple poppy that symbolizes respect and honour for the British armed forces. However the poppy had vanished when Starmer appeared in an anti-Islamophobia video aimed toward Muslims, who aren’t followers of the British armed forces. In any case, Jewish management of British politics signifies that Britain has been dropping bombs on Muslims for many years in international locations like Iraq and Afghanistan. It additionally signifies that Britain is backing Israel because it drops bombs on Muslims in Gaza. When Jeremy Corbyn was chief, he backed the Palestinians and opposed Israel’s murderous war-machine. Starmer does the other, however that brings me to a 3rd instance of his slipperiness. He served with out protest in Corbyn’s shadow cupboard and in 2019 was requested on BBC tv to repeat the sentence “Jeremy Corbyn would make an important prime minister.” He fortunately did so. A number of months later, he informed the BBC that “he was ‘100%’ behind Mr Corbyn and dealing with him to win a basic election.”
No goal however energy
However guess what? It seems that on a regular basis Starmer was 100% in opposition to Corbyn and serving within the shadow cupboard solely as a result of he thought Corbyn had no likelihood of profitable that basic election. When Starmer grew to become chief, he expelled Corbyn from the get together and completely repudiated Corbyn’s pernicious reign. In different phrases, Starmer has no rules and no goal however the pursuit of non-public energy. To win that energy, he has to serve Jewish pursuits. He additionally has to fake that Labour doesn’t detest White employees. That’s why, within the phrases of the BBC, he has “embraced British patriotism, utilizing the union jack as a backdrop for speeches and getting his convention to sing ‘God Save the King’.” In actuality, Starmer isn’t a patriot and doesn’t consider within the monarchy. Every thing about him is faux. His “landslide” victory was gained on a low turn-out and ludicrously low share of votes — barely larger than that gained by Corbyn in 2019, when Labour badly misplaced the election.
And it isn’t simply the identify of Starmer’s get together that’s a lie: it’s additionally his personal given identify. He was named by his Labour-supporting dad and mom after the Scottish firebrand Keir Hardie (1856-1915), the founder, chief and first member of parliament for Labour. Hardie was a real champion of the working class. So had been the Commerce Unions of Hardie’s day. When a mining firm in Scotland tried to import overseas employees initially of the 20 th century, that is what occurred:
Commerce Unions had been brazenly hostile, claiming that the newcomers’ lack of English made them a hazard at work; the Glasgow Trades Council declared the Lithuanians in Glengarnock as “an evil” and wrote to the TUC [Trades Union Congress] demanding immigration controls to maintain them out.Even a determine reminiscent of Keir Hardie, founding father of the Labour Social gathering, led a fierce, xenophobic marketing campaign in opposition to the Lithuanians. Hardie, as a pacesetter of Ayrshire miners, wrote an article for the journal, The Miner, wherein he acknowledged that: “For the second time of their historical past Messrs. Merry and Cunninghame have launched quite a lot of Russian Poles [as the Lithuanians were described] to Glengarnock Ironworks. What object they’ve in doing so is past human ken except it’s, as acknowledged by a speaker at Irvine, to show males learn how to reside on garlic and oil, or introduce the Black Dying, in order to eliminate the excess labourers.” (“Lithuanians in Lanarkshire,” BBC Historical past, February 2004)
In 2024 Sir Keir Starmer would heartily agree that his namesake Keir Hardie was “xenophobic.” Hardie wasn’t, in fact. As a substitute, he was doing precisely what a Lithuanian socialist would have accomplished if the state of affairs had been reversed: standing up for the native employees he was elected to serve. However that was initially of the 20 th century. By century’s finish, Labour’s betrayal of White employees was full. When Tony Blair grew to become Labour chief in 1994, all of the old style socialist nonsense had been discarded. Now the Labour get together champions the downtrodden bosses in opposition to the oppressive employees. Blair was a slippery lawyer identical to Starmer. And identical to Starmer, Blair knew that he needed to serve Jewish pursuits to win energy. That’s why Blair gained the final word accolade from Jews in Britain: he was a mensch. Starmer has simply gained that accolade too. He has been hailed within the Jewish Chronicle underneath the headline “Starmer is a mensch and deserving of our belief”:
After the final basic election, each political commentator speculated on whether or not the Labour Social gathering may ever maintain workplace once more. The spectre of the EHRC [Equality and Human Rights Commission] report [into alleged anti-Semitism in Labour] was an ever-present reminder of the nightmare of Corbyn’s tenure as chief of HM Opposition and practically everybody believed that Boris Johnson had constructed an electoral coalition that had completely redrawn our political map.But final week, the nation determined that the Labour Social gathering had modified, that we might be trusted to run the federal government and that change was wanted. … In consequence, Keir Starmer’s Labour Social gathering has a working majority of 181 seats and the Conservative Social gathering has had its worst consequence since 1832.
Even I battle to understand the total scale of what this implies for our nation, for my metropolis of Stoke-on-Trent and for our group. It’s past my wildest expectations and I can’t cease grinning each time I give it some thought. The pictures of Rachel Reeves, Wes Streeting, John Healey, Shabana Mahmood, Angela Smith, Peter Kyle, Ian Murray and the remainder of the brand new cupboard strolling down Downing Avenue on Friday made me sob with a lot happier tears than those who adopted the 2019 election.
5 years in the past, our group would have been scared by the considered a Labour landslide. The pages of the JC would have been stuffed with tales of households nervous in regards to the future and plans to make aliyah. Thank God that’s not the place we’re right now.
After tearing out the toxic plant of antisemitism from my get together by its roots, Keir (or the PM as I have to get used to calling him) has managed to rebuild sufficient belief with you that Hendon, Finchley and Golders Inexperienced, Chipping Barnet, Bury North, Bury South and East Renfrewshire have all returned Labour MPs. And I genuinely don’t consider that anybody, no matter their private politics, considers a Labour authorities as an existential risk to our group — as a result of it isn’t.
That in itself is really a miracle. I will probably be endlessly grateful to Keir for fixing what I believed had been irrevocably damaged.
He’s a mensch. And he deserves this chance to steer our nation within the years forward. He has earned our belief and we in flip owe him a good listening to as he turns from campaigning to governing. Elections are solely step one. Now we have now the privilege of service, making an attempt to repair what has been damaged in our society after 14 years of Conservative governments. (“Starmer is a mensch and deserving of our belief,” The Jewish Chronicle, tenth July, 2024)
That article was written by a extremely ethnocentric Jew known as Ruth Anderson, who served as a Labour MP underneath the Dickensian identify of Ruth Smeeth (appropriately sufficient, Dickens would have used the identify to suggest smarminess, selfishness, and hypocrisy). Whereas she was an MP, Smeeth wept in public when she was accused of working with the Conservative-supporting Every day Telegraph to undermine Jeremy Corbyn. She accused the truth-teller in query of “anti-Semitism” and had him expelled from the Labour get together. Then she left the get together and hilariously grew to become “chief govt” of Index on Censorship. In actuality, she no extra believes in free speech than Keir Starmer believes in championing the White working class. As a substitute, Starmer believes in private energy and in Pabloism, an obscure variant of the Marxist-Leninism created by the Jewish megalomaniac Leon Trotsky (1879-1940). Starmer grew to become a Pabloist at college, however no-one within the mainstream media is keen on that. How does it matter that the Labour chief was an enthusiastic supporter of the 20 th century’s most murderous and authoritarian ideology?
Fatuous and vacuous: by “Change,” Starmer means “Extra of the Similar”
Nevertheless it issues vastly when any Labour chief isn’t an enthusiastic servant of Jewish pursuits. The aim of mainstream politics in Britain and all different Western nations is to wage battle on Whites and sycophantically serve Semites. The faux Conservatives did that and the faux Labour get together will now do the identical. The one distinction is that Labour will wage battle on Whites with further enthusiasm, further authoritarianism, and further hatred for the White employees it was based to serve.
