Justice Division Sues TikTok and Mother or father Firm ByteDance for Widespread Violations of Kids’s Privateness Legal guidelines
🔗: https://t.co/lneVbaoBkZ pic.twitter.com/OUZyKtHZzg
— DOJ Civil Division (@DOJCivil) August 2, 2024
The Justice Division is accusing TikTok of violating privateness legal guidelines by permitting youngsters underneath 13 to create accounts and work together with adults. The lawsuit claims TikTok collected and stored children’ private info with out parental consent and did not implement correct safeguards. pic.twitter.com/rY8UJmGN0v
— CBS Night Information (@CBSEveningNews) August 2, 2024
WHY ARE CHILDREN UNDER 13 ON THE APP IF IT’S BAD FOR THEM??
How is that this not the accountability of the dad and mom?
Bear in mind when Marilyn Manson and Eminem have been getting blamed for the issues of boomers’ children? As a result of boomers didn’t suppose they have been liable for their very own children, they thought it was the job of the TV to boost them?
Mother and father are silly and lazy and so they don’t actually care about their very own youngsters.
The U.S. Justice Division filed a lawsuit Friday towards TikTok and mother or father firm ByteDance for failing to guard youngsters’s privateness on the social media app because the Biden administration continues its crackdown on the social media web site.The federal government mentioned TikTok violated the Kids’s On-line Privateness Safety Act that requires companies geared toward youngsters to acquire parental consent to gather private info from customers underneath age 13.
The Chinese language-owned short-video platform boasts round 170 million U.S. customers, and is at present preventing a brand new legislation that may pressure ByteDance to divest TikTok’s U.S. property by Jan. 19 or face a ban.
The lawsuit is the most recent U.S. motion towards TikTok and its Chinese language mother or father over fears the corporate improperly collects huge quantities of knowledge on Individuals for the Chinese language authorities, whereas influencing content material in a manner that would hurt Individuals.The go well with, which was joined by the Federal Commerce Fee, mentioned it was geared toward placing an finish “to TikTok’s illegal massive-scale invasions of kids’s privateness.”
The concept TikTok is worse than Instagram or Fb is retarded. I’m certain that is all “unhealthy for the youngsters,” however what does that even suggest?
Bear in mind after they did that complete factor that cigarettes have been unhealthy for the youngsters, after which mentioned that Camel cigarettes have been particularly unhealthy for the youngsters, as a result of Joe Camel was so cool no little one may resist his charms?
Possibly that is type of like that, I assume?
However… it’s truly simply because:
- US tech firms are complaining to their pawns in Congress that they don’t just like the competitors from TikTok, and
- TikTok permits movies from Gaza to go viral
Varied congressrats wished to ban TikTok over the primary subject, however that didn’t work. Then the second subject popped up, and the entire authorities leaped into motion.
It’s not particularly difficult.
Why do US politicians wish to ban TikTok? As a result of it uncovered how America’s CCP — the Confederacy of Criminals Get together aka US Congress — funneled trillions into wars and genocide in Palestine whereas neglecting to modernize US infrastructure and auto business that are each collapsing https://t.co/fl2ciRqoQP
— Information Chaser 🌎 🤦🏻♂️ (@Factschaser) June 5, 2024
TikTok is now the highest instructional software for Individuals/GenZ, peeling again the curtain on battle crimes and human rights abuses US has been committing in Palestine — a lot of which was masked with assist of Hollywood which distracted with shiny blockbusters and faux “actuality” reveals. https://t.co/jOTnILxMIo
— Information Chaser 🌎 🤦🏻♂️ (@Factschaser) Might 28, 2024
Anyway, this TikTok “save the youngsters” go well with comes similtaneously they’re making an attempt to pressure by a mass censorship invoice to “save the youngsters.”
My opinion is similar because it all the time was: “Fuck them children.”
To place it much less vulgarly: “Your children aren’t my downside, ma’am.”
You would ban principally something underneath the premise of “children may damage themselves with this.”
It’s dumb.
Youngsters’ web use is similar factor as children’ smoking habits: that is the issue of the dad and mom.
Frankly, it’s disgusting that these ladies exit and say “taking good care of my children is everybody’s downside.”
They’re your children, bitch.
For those who don’t need them smoking or giving all their non-public info to Chinese language communists or regardless of the hell we’re speaking about right here, you cease them from doing that. You’re their mother or father. They’re not my children and this isn’t my downside.
