Britain has now nearly fully fallen to cultural Communism. This has develop into clear within the wake of the protests of August 2024, which had been sparked by a 17-year-old second technology Rwandan immigrant murdering three little White women, and stabbing many extra, at Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport within the northwest of England. It was wrongly claimed on-line that the killer was a Muslim and a latest unlawful arrival, which sparked the unique riot which centred round Southport’s mosque.
However even when this was debunked, rioting, by the long-vilified White working class, continued. What had occurred was symbolic of an issue which the Labour authorities started when it was final in energy in 1997: mass-immigration, resulting in unspeakable crimes such because the grooming and rape of younger native women, ludicrous home costs, overwhelmed public providers and a sense of being invaded. The killer was international, an ethnic Rwandan; he was not native English. Within the panic that greeted the dysfunction, the brand new Labour authorities, elected, resulting from voter apathy, in a landslide solely a month earlier after 14 years in opposition, made their loathing for conventional English liberties, and for the English folks, shockingly clear.
New Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer declared that there was “no excuse” for the rioting. He had zero sympathy for the White working class as a result of they don’t seem to be a part of his coalition of virtue-signalling elitists and non-Whites. They don’t are likely to vote, besides to come back out and blasphemously vote for Brexit, they usually don’t like mass immigration. They’re thus, as Starmer put it, “far proper thugs.” Being each of low socioeconomic standing, and thus poor and unsightly, they evoke visceral disgust in Starmer and are potential allies of his harmful enemy; the populist proper. It has been discovered that disgust is decreased by energy, that means powerless individuals who act in aberrant approach sturdy induce disgust. This might be significantly pronounced in the event that they had been already an enemy and if an individual felt destructive emotions, like ethical disgust, strongly as a result of, being left wing, they had been excessive in Neuroticism, the essence of which is destructive emotions, and had been particularly delicate, as liberals are, to ethical disgust.
Consequently, democracy was, in a way, suspended and never even very subtly. Starmer, the previous head of the Crown Prosecution Service, will need to have recognized what he was doing however he did it anyway. Clearly shaken up by the depth and fury of the rioting, he declared that anybody concerned could be arrested, tried, discovered responsible and jailed. He additional pronounced that anybody spreading false info on-line might count on the identical destiny. At a stroke, he had fairly intentionally made clear that democracy is completed within the UK, a minimum of for the subsequent 5 years, till the subsequent election. How so?
In English Regulation, as within the US, powers are separated as a bulwark towards tyranny. An individual might solely be arrested if the police consider there’s purpose to arrest him, and if an individual is wrongfully arrested he has authorized redress, in order that they should be cautious. He’s solely tried if the Crown Prosecution Service believes {that a} conviction is possible. On the subject of abstract offences, the place you may serve no quite a lot of years in jail equivalent to public dysfunction, you’re solely discovered responsible if the magistrates consider that you’re responsible, and you’re given a jail sentence at their sole discretion.
In making the remarks he did, Starmer, the King’s Chief Minister, was knowingly corrupting this complete course of. He was pressuring the police, the prosecutors and the magistrates such that none of those folks, who’re, in the end, appointed by the federal government, might behave pretty. In different phrases, he had, by stress, politicised the system, much more so than was already the case, with New Labour already having marched by the establishments since 1997, introducing Woke imperatives about commitments to equality, as Sean Gabb has explored in depth in his ebook, Tradition Revolution, Tradition Conflict.
The outcome, it appears, has been folks pleading responsible to obscure offences equivalent to “inciting racial hatred” for saying “Allah, Allah, who the fuck is a Allah!” as a result of it’s fairly apparent that the magistrates, beneath authorities stress, will discover them responsible, so their solicitor advises them to plead responsible with a view to get a lesser sentence.
It must be famous that one of many causes of the riots is the flagrant two-tier policing within the UK. As I’ve explored in my new ebook Woke Eugenics, the Muslim shoppers of the Woke State can successfully get away with little one rape, whereas those that offend consumer teams of the Left, equivalent to over-excited, indignant, working-class English folks, can count on hefty jail sentences. The federal government and police deny this, with the chief of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Mark Rowley, lately being so assured it was unfaithful that he broke the microphone of a journalist who had the temerity to ask about it.
Worse nonetheless, and with a view to stem the rioting and on-line inflammatory dialogue, Starmer declared that it was crime to unfold misinformation and that those that did so could be prosecuted and jailed. That is merely unfaithful, as he nicely knew. It’s a crime, as of final yr, to knowingly unfold misinformation when that is prone to lead to non-trivial bodily or psychological hurt to any person. Thus, an absolute defence is that you just didn’t know that the knowledge you retweeted was unfaithful.
Nonetheless, within the UK now, a lady has been arrested in Cheshire for tweeting misinformation concerning the Rwandan killer. The pinnacle of the Crown Prosecution Service introduced that you may be arrested for retweeting true details about the riots and, simply earlier than they subsided, with Elon Musk having taken the facet of the English folks, the left had been speaking about banning Twitter within the UK, inserting the UK alongside North Korea; unsurprising contemplating the roots of New Labour in supporters of Brezhnev.
Commentators in each the UK, equivalent to libertarian Sean Gabb, and elsewhere have been remarking on the Neo-Communist techniques of Britain’s Labour Social gathering for a few years. In some ways, they shouldn’t be a stunned, although they’ve been introduced with such slick, manipulative PR that they appear to stay as such. On the peak of the Chilly Conflict main figures on this authorities, equivalent to someday House Secretary Jack Straw, had been members of the Communist Social gathering or teams sympathetic to it, with all which that suggests about their views.
They ultimately rejected financial socialism, with a view to get elected, however leftist hatred of custom, resentment of success, pure treason (the place you establish with one other group, a “deprived” one, over your individual, with a view to appear type and so manipulatively acquire energy over your individual group), and the leftist psychological instability that results in paranoid authoritarianism had by no means gone away. (I discover all of this in Woke Eugenics if you would like the associated scholarly papers).
After every week of rioting, Starmer met together with his “Cobra” anti-terrorism group and devised a plan. Instantly, it was introduced on all UK media that there could be 30 “far proper” protests in a single night time, with the implication that the federal government had been frightened that anarchy could be the outcome. This was apparent an enormous hoax, a Psych Op, as Nick Lowles, the top of the “anti-Fascist” group “Hope Not Hate” admitted. It was apparent, actually, as a result of the protests had been all going to be in multicultural areas, together with the “Homosexual Capital” of Brighton. The outcome? Large protests by the acute left, and by violent Muslim activists, in favour of destroying Britain and declaring in all of the newspapers that the “true British” had turned out to defeat the “far proper.”
What was the purpose of this? It was to interrupt the morale of the far proper, buoy the regime’s shoppers (foreigners and violent White Woke extremists who act as its enforcers) and, hopefully, idiot the British folks. After all, like a Potemkin village, it has achieved no such factor. It has solely proven the British folks that, as with Communists, the regime has no selection however to blatantly lie, as the issues with their Multicultural, Postmodern, moralistic ideology — social disintegration, collapsing belief, racial battle, appalling crime, grooming and rape of native women, an environment of worry, de facto Islamic states inside England — develop into ever extra clear, within the hope that the inevitable collapse, through which all the pieces they’re invested in falls aside, is postponed. Till that point arrives, as with the dying years of the Soviet Union, tyranny and deception might be ramped up increasingly.
Till the Sixties, America noticed itself because the true England, extra English than England, as Eric Kaufmann has proven in The Rise and Fall of Anglo-America. It was the inheritor to pre-Norman Conquest, Anglo-Saxon world: with out social class, excessive on liberty; democratic. England has been conquered anew by the French within the type of its worst thought: Postmodernism; that reality is subjective, all cultures are equal and difficult custom is an ethical responsibility.
Perhaps it’s time for “England West” to rescue its brother throughout the ocean once more, simply because it did in World Conflict II, however to rescue it not from Continental tyranny however from itself. In spite of everything, like Iraq, it’s a tyranny, its leaders abuse its folks; it’s an enemy of American liberty, it’s toying with adopting insurance policies related to China and North Korea (America’s adversaries) and it has numerous oil . . .
