For many years, New Age guru Barbara Marx Hubbard preached a futurist gospel of “aware evolution” guided by “love and light-weight.” But, on the identical time, in stark distinction, Hubbard additionally touted Malthusian inhabitants management. If Hubbard known as for the human inhabitants to be culled, then how might she have genuinely floated her goals of aware evolution sincerely upon the “self-actualization” mantras of the Human Potential Motion or the “co-creation” ethos of her New Age homilies?
Whereas Hubbard’s advocacy for inhabitants management contradicts the benevolent rhetoric of her New Age spiritualism, her Malthusianism cohesively aligns along with her championing of transhumanism. As I historicized in a earlier article entitled Barbara Marx Hubbard: Godmother of Transhumanism and Artificial Spirituality, transhumanism was conceptualized by Julian Huxley because the second section of eugenics, which might artificially improve Darwinian evolution by merging human biology with machines. In truth, based on Darwin’s autobiography, his concept of evolution by pure choice, which impressed his cousin Francis Galton to develop the pseudo-science of eugenics, was conceived because the organic consequence of rising populations competing for restricted sources in a Malthusian ecology:
“I [Darwin] occurred to learn for amusement ‘Malthus on Inhabitants,’ and being nicely ready to understand the wrestle for existence which in every single place goes on from lengthy continued remark of the habits of animals and vegetation, it directly struck me that below these circumstances beneficial variations would are typically preserved, and unfavourable ones to be destroyed. The results of this may be the formation of latest species. Right here then I had eventually obtained a concept by which to work.”
Briefly, Malthusianism is the bedrock of Darwinism, which is the inspiration of eugenics, which is the cornerstone of transhumanism. Put one other method, transhumanism encompasses each the Malthusian-sustainable management of inhabitants amount and the Darwinian-eugenic management of inhabitants high quality by way of technocracy.
In my first installment on this collection, I documented how Hubbard, bankrolled by Rockefeller “philanthropy,” teamed up with Abraham Maslow’s Eupsychian Community, together with the Esalen Institute, to push trans-eugenic evolution by means of partnerships with the HeartMath Institute, which propagates transhumanist neurofeedback wearables which can be programmed to induce artificial non secular bliss. On this present installment, I’ll clarify how Hubbard’s imaginative and prescient for “aware” transhuman evolution is inseparable from her Malthusian outlook on human inhabitants development and sustainable ecology. Extra particularly, I’ll expose how:
- Hubbard championed Malthusian inhabitants management insurance policies superior by the environmentalist forecasts of the Membership of Rome’s Limits to Development and the sustainable growth initiatives of United Nations (UN) Agenda 2030.
- Hubbard collaborated with World Financial Discussion board (WEF) globalist, Maurice Robust, who spearheaded UN Agenda 21’s sustainable growth program, and Membership of Rome member Mikhail Gorbachev, who co-created the Earth Constitution “sustainable growth” initiative in partnership with Robust.
In future installments of this collection, I’ll reveal how Hubbard’s Malthusian environmentalism was formed by her non secular muse, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin; her kindred “psychological mutant,” Jonas Salk [2]; and her longtime monetary benefactor, Laurance Rockefeller. I can even unveil how Hubbard’s affiliations with the World Future Society, the Human Potential Motion, and the Basis for Aware Evolution had been related to networks of alleged pedophiles and sexual abuse cults.
Hubbard and the “Riders of the Pale Horse”
The next quote, which has been broadly circulated as a purported excerpt from Hubbard’s 1993 E book of Co-Creation, declares that “one-fourth” of humanity will have to be culled with a purpose to usher in a utopian New World Order:
“[o]ut of the total spectrum of the human character, one-fourth is elected to transcend and one-fourth are harmful, faulty seeds. Prior to now they had been permitted to die a pure demise. Now, as we strategy the quantum shift from the creature-human to the co-creative human―the human who’s an heir of god-like powers―the harmful one-fourth should be eradicated from the social physique. Happily, you aren’t answerable for this act. We’re. We’re accountable for God’s choice course of for planet Earth. He selects―we destroy. We’re the riders of the pale horse, Dying.”
To make certain, this passage can’t be discovered inside the pages of Hubbard’s E book of Co-Creation. Nonetheless, The Mail Archive, which information “archived postings” and “lively mailing lists,”logs an electronic mail change during which Hubbard reportedly acknowledged that this passage was excerpted “from a manuscript which has not been revealed.” In keeping with The Mail Archive, on “Thursday, November 04, 1999,” Hubbard replied to an electronic mail from a Dave Hartley, who had shared the misattributed passage along with his electronic mail listing:
Pricey Dave: whoever you’re, this quote is taken fully out of context from a manuscript which has not been revealed. The passage you refered [sic] to referred to the thought that we don’t have to undergo the Armageddon situation that was predicted within the e book of Revelation. The entire function of the E book of Cocreation [sic] is to say that the human species has the liberty to keep away from the large destruction predicted. The that means of that exact passage, which I by no means revealed, as a result of I don’t consider it in any respect, got here from the possiblity [sic] that if there’s to be any additional huge destruction on this earth, it is not going to be perpetrated by people, however by another drive.
I personally don’t consider this, haven’t revealed this, won’t ever revealed it. My entire life is devoted to bringing higher peace and gentleness to the human race.
This quote has been utilized by a small minority of individuals in search of to wreck the reputations of many individuals and I ask you to launch it, tear it up. IT shouldn’t be viable. I completely refute it, and ask you to be variety sufficient to do the identical.
With appreciation to your concern, Barbara Marx Hubbard
In keeping with this electronic mail, Hubbard took possession of the notorious passage whereas concurrently disavowing it. Though she “completely refute[d]” the quote, emphasizing how she “by no means revealed” it, she didn’t deny ever writing it; fairly, she admitted that she had written it in “a manuscript which has not been revealed.” Certainly, she even tried to rescue “the that means of that exact passage” by suggesting that the passage emphasizes how the Malthusian “destruction” of the human inhabitants would “not be perpetrated by people, however by another drive,” and provided that humankind abdicates its “freedom to keep away from the large destruction predicted.” Clearly, that is contradicted by Hubbard’s use of the non-public pronoun “we” within the active-voice building of the ultimate sentences, which proclaim, “[w]e are accountable for God’s choice course of for planet Earth. He selects―we destroy. We’re the riders of the pale horse, Dying.”
Discover right here that she additionally didn’t outrightly reject the premise that some type of Malthusian depopulation, whether or not voluntarily or by way of “another drive,” can be a vital precondition for the aware evolution of the human species. In truth, this theoretical dilemma, which posits that people should rein in inhabitants development or else endure “huge destruction” from “different forces” of ecological disaster, is the crux of Malthusian concept. Within the 1803 version of An Essay on the Precept of Inhabitants, economist Thomas Malthus enumerated that “(1) Inhabitants is essentially restricted by the technique of subsistence. (2) Inhabitants invariably will increase the place the technique of subsistence improve, except prevented by some very highly effective and apparent checks.” Based mostly on these “Ideas of Inhabitants,” Malthus known as for “preventive checks” on overpopulation with a purpose to avert “huge destruction” from “different forces” of ecological disaster, together with “famine,” “plague,” and “pestilence.”
To make certain, this electronic mail change between Hubbard and Hartley can’t be verified. Underneath the “Authentic Message” header, the e-mail addresses are “protected”: “From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] . . . To: [EMAIL PROTECTED].” Moreover, on the very prime of the e-mail thread is a heading that reads “Caveat Lector,” which mainly interprets as “reader beware,” indicating that the knowledge contained therein will not be correct.
If this electronic mail shouldn’t be fabricated, and Hubbard did in truth write the passage, then her genocidal imaginative and prescient of Malthusian-eugenic inhabitants discount, even when solely drafted in an unpublished manuscript, can’t be reconciled or spirit-washed with any quantity of benevolent rhetoric she touted. That she would draft such a genocidal proposition in any respect, even when she disavowed it later, reveals a window into the darker undercurrents behind her goals of aware evolution, particularly since she by no means outrightly denounced the necessity for depopulation.
It’s price noting that, in The Revelation: Our Disaster Is a Delivery (The E book of Co-Creation), which is the e book that’s alleged to comprise the notorious quote in query, there’s a passage that reads as if it might be a revised model of the infamous “pale horse” quote:
“at a time of Quantum Transformation, the momentum of previous actions forces these actions to overshoot the mark. ‘Be fruitful and multiply’ goes too far and turns into overpopulation. ‘Protect human life’ goes too far and leads to undesirable prolongation of creature/human existence. ‘Give meals and shelter to the individuals’ turns into the overindustrialization, air pollution, inflation, and useful resource depletion by the developed world. . . .
‘Be fruitful and multiply’ now turns into ‘Consciously conceive youngsters who will probably be given the chance of optimum growth.’
‘Protect all life’ now turns into ‘Avail your self of the chance for chosen demise, and chosen prolonged life.’ Thanatology and gerontology enter the scene. Dying may be chosen by those that have completed their work on Earth. The aim of superior medical applied sciences is to not keep creature/human our bodies in a semivegetative state. It’s for use by these minds which can be motivated to do new work on Earth and particularly within the new environments of outer house, to increase life, change our bodies, and finally construct new our bodies accustomed to the brand new circumstances of common life, no matter they could be. . . .
‘Give meals and shelter to the individuals’ now turns into ‘Activate the artistic revolution–constructing new worlds on Earth, new worlds in house,’ an surroundings of sources able to assembly the wants of all members of that physique. The inhabitants overgrowth on Earth should stop. Solely those that select to stay on, shall. The others will voluntarily go to their relaxation. That is the brand new situation towards which the magnificent achievements of the previous have taken you” [1].
Discover that this passage from the E book of Co-Creation refers to a “Quantum Transformation” whereas the unpublished passage refers to a “quantum shift.” Discover additionally that each passages name for human inhabitants to be culled; the unpublished passage proclaims that “one-fourth [of humankind] should be eradicated from the social physique” whereas the E book of Co-Creation declares that “[t]he inhabitants overgrowth on Earth should stop. Solely those that select to stay on, shall.” The one actual distinction between these passages is that the unpublished excerpt glorifies how Hubbard and her evolutionary “riders of the pale horse” will selectively cull the inhabitants whereas the E book of Co-Creation prophesies that the “unfit” will voluntarily cull themselves from the human inhabitants. Though the rhetoric within the E book of Co-Creation is much less menacing than the rhetoric within the unpublished excerpt, the previous nonetheless asserts the Malthusian prognosis that human inhabitants should be culled to ensure that the human species to consciously evolve into the New Age.
To be truthful, it’s attainable that the unpublished passage is definitely a counterfeit. However even when it’s a fabrication, there are a number of different excerpts from Hubbard’s writings, as you will notice, during which she promotes Malthusian technique of inhabitants management.
Malthusian Limits to Development: Hubbard and the Membership of Rome
Hubbard’s Malthusian overpopulation theories had been partly impressed by the Membership of Rome’s Limits to Development: A Report for the Membership of Rome’s Mission on the Predicament of Mankind. In truth, in Hubbard’s E book of Co-Creation, there are a number of passages which warn of Malthusian “limits to development” that would result in ecological catastrophes [1]. She additionally met personally with Membership of Rome Co-Founder, Aurelio Peccei [2], who prompted the World Financial Discussion board to undertake the Malthusian tenets of the Limits to Development on the World Financial Discussion board’s Third Annual Assembly in 1973.
Established in 1968, the Membership of Rome is a globalist non-governmental group (NGO) that convenes conferences between heads of states, members of royal households, enterprise leaders, worldwide financiers, educational students, laboratory scientists, and directors of world governance establishments, such because the UN, the World Financial institution, the Worldwide Financial Fund (IMF), and the Group for Financial Cooperation and Improvement (OECD). Modeled after the “Spherical Desk” construction of the Bilderberg Group, the Royal Institute for Worldwide Affairs (RIIA), and the Council on Overseas Relations (CFR), the Membership of Rome facilitates conferences the place delegates plan the worldwide financial system by means of public-private stewardship of the world’s pure and human sources in accordance with the Malthusian ecology of sustainable growth. Membership of Rome member André Hoffmann can also be a trustee of one other Spherical Desk NGO, the WEF, which is advancing the Nice Reset to usher in public-private stakeholder sustainability for the technocratic Fourth Industrial Revolution.
In 1972, the Membership of Rome’s Limits to Development revealed the outcomes of computer-simulated forecasts calculated by a group of scientists recruited from Massachusetts Institute of Know-how (MIT). The Membership of Rome’s MIT group was led by Dennis Meadows, who’s a member of the WEF. One other central architect of the Membership of Rome’s Mission on the Predicament of Mankind was MIT Professor Jay W. Forrester, who was commissioned by the Membership of Rome to use his System Dynamics concept to design laptop fashions that will graph inhabitants development, useful resource consumption, and environmental air pollution forecasts, all of which supplied the idea for the Malthusian thesis of Limits to Development. Whereas working at MIT, Forrester programmed the World One laptop, which modeled a prediction of the Malthusian collapse of civilization in 2040. In keeping with Large Suppose “2020 is the primary milestone envisioned by World One. . . . ‘At round 2020, the situation of the planet turns into extremely vital.’” In a number of publications and speeches, Hubbard concurred with the World One laptop forecasts as she predicted that 2020 can be the “shift” level for a “new norm.”
On the identical time, Hubbard’s E book of Co-Creation explicitly invokes the Membership of Rome’s Malthusian “limits to development” rhetoric. In a chapter titled “The Journey,” she writes, “[o]ne extra doubling of the world inhabitants will destroy our life-support system. Our Mom is not going to assist us if we proceed to develop in numbers! We should cease. . . . The so-called ‘inhabitants disaster’ is a disaster of our planetary delivery. The bounds to development on Earth shift us from procreation to co-creation” [1]. Be aware right here how Hubbard asserted that human inhabitants has reached a Malthusian “limits to development” which can render “Mom Earth” incapable of sustaining life except we collectively curtail “procreation.”
The Membership of Rome’s Limits to Development shouldn’t be solely Malthusian in precept, however a survey of its bibliography reveals that it’s also backed by intensive citations from an array of Malthusian-eugenicists and affiliated establishments which were devoted to inhabitants management. These embrace:
- Jospeh J. Spengler: a eugenicist who contributed to the League of Nations World Inhabitants Convention, which was orchestrated below the management of Malthusian–eugenicist Margaret Sanger.
- Frank Notestein: an American Eugenics Society (AES) member, who was the founding director of the Inhabitants Division of the UN Division of Financial and Social Affairs (UN DESA); an “Organizer” of the Second UN World Inhabitants Convention; anda president of each the Inhabitants Affiliation of America and the Inhabitants Council.
- Alexander Morris Carr-Saunders: a secretary of the Analysis Committee of the British Eugenics Training Society and a protégé of eugenicist Karl Pearson, who was himself a protégé of the founding father of eugenics, Francis Galton.
- The Inhabitants Reference Bureau: a world NGO that advances Malthusian inhabitants management applications by means of partnerships with the UN Fund for Inhabitants Actions (UNFPA); the Invoice and Melinda Gates Basis; the Inhabitants Council; and the Inhabitants Affiliation of America, which was based by AES President Henry Pratt Fairchild and AES Co-Founder Frederick Osborn, who was additionally a president of the Inhabitants Council.
- Ecoscience: Inhabitants, Assets, Setting: a e book written by Paul Ehrlich (creator of the Inhabitants Bomb) and John P. Holdren (US President Barack Obama’s White Home Science Czar), each of whom postulated Malthusian inhabitants management insurance policies, together with the spiking of consuming water with sterilants and the imposition of a government-issued “long-term sterilizing capsule that might be implanted below the pores and skin. . .and may be detachable, with official permission.”
In 2016, Jørgen Randers, who was one other captain of the MIT group that produced Limits to Development, co-authored one other Malthusian “Report of the Membership of Rome.” Titled Reinventing Prosperity: Managing Financial Development to Cut back Unemployment, Inequality, and Local weather Change, this “Report,” which reasserts the Malthusian forecasts of Limits to Development, declared that “the poor world ought to search to enhance the lot of its inhabitants by utilizing no matter means vital,” together with “comply with[ing] the instance of China and search[ing] to restrict their populations, not with a one-child coverage essentially however by means of improved schooling and well being, extra simply accessible contraception―and ideally, by paying a bonus to these households who’ve had fewer than two youngsters” [3].
Not solely had been the Malthusian-eugenics of Limits to Development adopted rhetorically by Barbara Marx Hubbard, however she additionally met personally with the co-founder of the Membership of Rome. In her 1989 autobiography, The Starvation of Eve, Hubbard relayed how she “had met Aurelio Peccei, head of the membership [of Rome], in Bucharest in 1972 at a World Futurist Congress” [2]. Hubbard disagreed with Peccei’s outlook on the extent to which civilizational development should be curtailed to keep away from ecological disaster. Nonetheless, she nonetheless concurred with Peccei that environmental useful resource consumption should be curbed to not less than a point with a purpose to keep away from the ecological catastrophes forecasted in Limits to Development.
In truth, Hubbard promoted the Committee for the Future’s “Choiceful Future,” which “accepted the Limits to Development place of the need for conservation of nonrenewable sources, for decentralization, variety, self-sufficiency, use of applicable expertise, and respect for nature, the surroundings and all individuals as members of our personal physique” [2]. To place it one other method, Hubbard assimilated Peccei’s push for the rationing of restricted “nonrenewable sources” whereas she additionally synthesized his environmental “conservation” along with her personal name for sustainable financial growth by means of modern “use[s] of applicable expertise.”
Equally, Hubbard additionally affirmed that “[t]right here was a lot that was optimistic and proper about” the Limits to Development thesis regardless that she was vital of the Limits to Development “advocates” who resolved that ecological catastrophes might solely be averted by way of ultra-Malthusian checks on the worldwide population-growth/resource-consumption ratio. She acknowledged that:
“the Membership of Rome’s Limits to Development . . . thought of earth [sic] a finite system with mounted sources and counselled us to adapt to the present limitations, and even to ‘return’ to an easier stage of life as proposed by the deep ecologists. There was a lot that was optimistic and proper about this attitude: restoration of the surroundings, decentralization, self-sufficiency, re-location of business, power effectivity, non-money economies, the barter system, cooperatives and the rebuilding of neighborhood. Nonetheless, lots of its advocates denied even the potential of a concurrent and complementary, and equally pure, growth of a brand new surroundings past our biosphere.” [2]
Once more, Hubbard assimilated the Membership of Rome’s insurance policies in regards to the “restoration of the surroundings” by means of useful resource conservation whereas she additionally synthesized the Membership of Rome’s insurance policies along with her personal name for sustainable growth by means of outer-space applied sciences that may allow the “growth of a brand new surroundings past our biosphere,” thereby growing the worldwide population-growth/resource-consumption ratio.
In The E book of Co-Creation, in a chapter titled “Revelation,” Hubbard expounds on the methods during which “useful resource scarcity” and “overpopulation” may be transcended with “‘postnatal’ applied sciences . . . similar to astronautics, genetics, longevity, cybernetics, robotics and nanotechnology” that may be utilized to capitalize on “the common surroundings past the biosphere”:
“[t]he meta-crises of limits started: useful resource scarcity, overpopulation, alienation, confusion, malaise concerning the future, disconnection with the previous. Consultants with an Earthbound perspective advocated a return to the less complicated previous, an adaptation to limits, a program of most conservation, and no development. On the identical time, some futurists wrote of a paradigm shift from self-centeredness to whole-centeredness. And a few evolutionaries proclaimed the prolonged gospel of ‘postnatal’ applied sciences, to be developed inside the womb of Earth to be used after delivery within the common surroundings past the biosphere, similar to astronautics, genetics, longevity, cybernetics, robotics and nanotechnology.” [1]
In sum, Hubbard affirmed the Malthusian premises of the Membership of Rome’s Limits to Development, and she or he believed that human inhabitants development needs to be regulated accordingly. On the identical time, she believed that Malthusian inhabitants management needs to be complemented with transhumanist technological improvements which might allow people to effectively steward interplanetary sources at sustainable charges of consumption.
Malthusian “Sustainability”: Hubbard, Robust, Gorbachev
On prime of adopting the Malthusian tenets of the Membership of Rome’s Limits to Development, Hubbard collaborated with Maurice Robust, who was instrumental in establishing the UN Environmental Program (UNEP), coining the time period “sustainable growth,” and launching UN Agenda 21, which has since been revamped as Agenda 2030. Hubbard additionally collaborated with a cohort of New Age Soviets in the course of the political rise of the primary and solely President of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev [2], who was a Membership of Rome member who partnered with Robust to arrange the Earth Constitution world sustainability venture along with the launch of Agenda 21. Altogether, Hubbard’s Malthusian outlook on “limits to development” and “sustainable growth” was evidently formed by her connections to Robust and Gorbachev, who performed pivotal roles in ushering within the UN’s Sustainable Improvement Objectives (SDGs), which are actually pillars of the WEF’s Nice Reset for the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
Robust served alongside Hubbard on the World Future Society’s (WFS) International Advisory Council. Underneath the directorship of Hubbard and Robust, the WFS’s flagship publication, The Futurist, printed not less than one situation that advocates for “sustainable existence,” together with “sustainable consumption habits,” for a “sustainable financial system” in a “sustainable future.” On this 2014 situation of The Futurist, an article titled “Demographics, Consumption, and Local weather Change” experiences that “[m]odels for climate-change situations have to dig beneath population-growth projections to grasp their potential affect on the surroundings. Whereas it’s true that extra individuals consuming extra sources can have extra affect, it’s the place the inhabitants development is occurring that issues.” In fact, Robust was one of many founding fathers of Neo-Malthusian sustainable growth.
In 1972, the identical yr that the Membership of Rome revealed its Malthusian treatise in Limits to Development, Robust led the UN Convention on the Human Setting (UNCHE), which resulted within the formation of the UNEP the place he grew to become its first government director. Then, in 1987, Robust, who was additionally a member of the WEF Basis Board, grew to become a member of the UN World Fee on Setting and Improvement (WCED) the place the time period “sustainable growth” was coined within the “Report of the WCED,” which incorporates 298 references to “inhabitants.” 5 years later, the Membership of Rome formally adopted the time period “sustainable growth” in its publication of Past the Limits: Confronting International Collapse, Envisioning a Sustainable Future, which is the sequel to Limits to Development. That very same yr, in 1992, Robust led the UN Earth Summit Convention in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, ensuing within the kickoff of UN Agenda 21, which established “sustainability” as one of many 8 Millennium Improvement Objectives (MDGs) that are actually revamped because the 17 Agenda 2030 SDGs. It is very important observe right here that SDG 5.6, which “[e]nsure[s] common entry to sexual and reproductive well being and reproductive rights,” is explicitly guided by the Neo-Malthusian “household planning” tenets of the Program of Motion of the UN’s 1994 Worldwide Convention on Inhabitants and Improvement.
In Hubbard’s 2001 Emergence: The Shift from Ego to Essence, she echoed the Malthusian overpopulation catastrophism and sustainable environmentalism touted in each the Membership of Rome’s Limits to Development treatises and the UN’s surroundings and inhabitants conferences: “[y]ou hit a definitive restrict to development in your present mode” during which “[t]right here are not any grownup Common people who’ve been by means of the transition from a high-technology, over-populating, polluting world on the fringe of destroying its personal life-support methods to a brand new world that’s sustainable, compassionate, and life-enhancing” [4]. Later in the identical chapter, Hubbard writes, “[w]herever they’ve the selection, ladies are shifting from huge procreation to co-creation. Now we have reached a restrict to inhabitants development on Earth. Another doubling of the inhabitants will take us over ten billion. We will have fewer youngsters―whether or not by selection or disaster is the one query” [4]. In different phrases, for Hubbard, sustainable growth encompasses not solely the elimination of environmental air pollution, but additionally the Malthusian limitation of human inhabitants development.
Based mostly on this sustainable-Malthusian equation, human inhabitants itself may be equivocated to a type of air pollution that should be expunged from the planet, which is actually what the Membership of Rome proclaimed in The First International Revolution. Printed one yr earlier than the UN arrange Agenda 21, this “Report by the Council of the Membership of Rome,” which requires world “sustainable growth,” incorporates a bit titled “The Widespread Enemy of Humanity Is Man,” declaring that:
“[i]n trying to find a brand new enemy to unite us, we got here up with the concept that air pollution, the specter of world warming, water shortages, famine and the like would match the invoice. Of their totality and of their interactions these phenomena do represent a typical menace which calls for the solidarity of all peoples. However in designating them because the enemy, we fall into the entice about which we’ve already warned, particularly mistaking signs for causes. All these risks are attributable to human intervention and it is just by means of modified attitudes and behavior that they are often overcome. The actual enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
Acknowledged in another way, since people are the reason for air pollution, “humanity itself” may be equivocated to the best environmental pollutant which is the “actual enemy” of the planet; in flip, environmental air pollution should be prevented by eradicating human pollution from the inhabitants.
Shortly after the launch of Agenda 21 on the UN Earth Summit, Robust partnered with Membership of Rome member Gorbachev to launch Earth Constitution, which mixed Gorbachev’s Inexperienced Cross Worldwide with Robust’s Earth Council to kind a world sustainable growth initiative that will buoy UN Agenda 21 initiatives. It needs to be famous that Robust and Gorbachev had been launched to one another by Membership of Rome and Bilderberg Group member, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, who’s the daughter of Bilderberg Founder, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands. A former Nazi stormtrooper, Prince Bernhard was the “honorary sponsor” of the Third Annual WEF Assembly the place Peccei introduced the Membership of Rome’s Malthusian Limits to Development to the WEF, which is now bolstering the UN’s SDGs by means of its Nice Reset initiatives, together with “Environmental, Social, and Governance” (ESG) scoring schemes designed to penalize firms that fail to adjust to SDG benchmarks. Briefly, the Gorbachev-Robust sustainability alliance was orchestrated to function a vital pivot level within the world governance nexus of the UN, the Membership of Rome, the Bilderberg Group, and the WEF; and Hubbard had ties to this nexus by means of Gorbachev, Robust, the UN, and the Membership of Rome.
Hubbard’s ties to Gorbachev stem from her collaborations with Soviet New Agers in the course of the Nineteen Eighties. In keeping with her autobiography, The Starvation of Eve, in 1985, the Director of the Heart for Soviet-American Dialogue, Rama Vernon, who was a yoga teacher, swayed Hubbard to journey to the Soviet Union. Whereas visiting the Union of Socialist Soviet Republics (USSR), Hubbard met with a pacesetter within the Soviet “citizen diplomacy motion,” Joseph Goldin, who enthusiastically mentioned prospects of Soviet-American “co-creation” aimed toward reaching the utopian futurist visions of her mentor, R. Buckminster Fuller [2], who’s cited within the Membership of Rome’s Limits to Development. Hubbard was even “given buttons that stated ‘Co-creator’ in English and Russian, with a diagram of the evolutionary spiral” [2].
A pair years later, in 1987, Hubbard met on the:
“Cosmos Lodge . . . with Gennadi Alferenko, who was the founding father of the Basis for Social Innovations within the Soviet Union, and Rustem Khairov, who was working with Yevgeny Velikhov, the particular science advisor to Gorbachev. We had been planning the following main symposium, to be held in March, 1987, in Moscow entitled ‘A New Method of Pondering within the Nuclear Age — Social Improvements for the Third Millennium.” [2]
The subsequent yr, Hubbard “was amazed and delighted when on December 7, 1988 Gorbachev addressed the Common Meeting of the United Nations, calling for ‘the form of cooperation that would extra precisely be termed co-creation and co-development’” [2]. Discover right here that, based on Hubbard, each she and Gorbachev invoked the “co-creation” rhetoric of “aware evolution.”
Hubbard went on to reward Gorbachev as a preeminent world chief who might “be our co-creative companion in restoring the surroundings . . . and increasing outer house peacefully”:
“I considered Gorbachev as a political Sputnik. When Khrushchev put up Sputnik, he shocked us, and we responded with Apollo. If we acknowledged that the Soviet Union needn’t be our enemy, however might be our co-creative companion in restoring the surroundings, liberating individuals’s creativity and increasing outer house peacefully, what would occur over right here? . . . It might usher within the best age of cooperation and co-creation on a world scale that has ever been seen on earth [sic]. I felt that that is what we’re making ready for now.” [2]
Emphasizing the globalist, environmentalist, and futurist affinities between herself and Gorbachev, Hubbard reported that even UN Assistant Secretary Common, Robert Muller, who authored the UN’s World Core instructional curriculum, highlighted how she and Gorbachev shared kindred visions of “co-creating” world sustainable growth enterprises devoted to “restoring the surroundings” and “increasing outer house”: “Robert Muller, former Assistant Common of the United Nations known as me up and stated, ‘Barbara, you’re the individual on this world who sounds most like Gorbachev’” [2]. It’s price noting right here that Gorbachev’s shut advisors, together with Hubbard’s comrades, Velikhov and Goldin, additionally collaborated with the Esalen Institute, which, together with Hubbard, was a part of Abraham Maslow’s transhumanist Eupsychian Community.
To sum all of it up, Hubbard endorsed the sustainable growth directives of UN Agenda 21, and she or he was related to 2 of its strongest architects: Gorbachev and Robust, who had been main figures on the epicenter of the worldwide governance nexus of the UN, the Membership of Rome, the Bilderberg Group, and the WEF. Merely put, Hubbard performed an influential position within the historic growth of UN Agenda 2030’s Neo-Malthusian SDGs, which are actually being instituted throughout the globe by means of the WEF’s Nice Reset for the Fourth Industrial Revolution and different means.
Malthusian Globalization: The UN, the State of the World Discussion board, and the Spherical Desk Oligarchy
The liaisons between Hubbard, Gorbachev, and Robust weren’t restricted to their associations by means of the Heart for Soviet-American Dialogue and the World Future Society [2]. Hubbard additionally crossed paths with Robust and Gorbachev by means of the UN and the State of the World Discussion board (SWF). Briefly, Hubbard not solely echoed Robust and Gorbachev of their “co-creative” development of the sustainable growth initiatives of the UN, the Membership of Rome, the WEF, the WFS, and the SWF; she additionally labored instantly with the SWF and the UN to push the MDGs and SDGs of Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 respectively.
In 2016, Hubbard addressed the UN Excessive Stage Discussion board on the Tradition of Peace the place she gave a speech at a panel titled “Enhancing Synergy between Sustainable Improvement Objectives and eight Motion Areas of the UN Program of Motion on the Tradition of Peace.” Throughout this speech, she pontificated that “the Tradition of Peace provides a dimension to the SDG targets, a imaginative and prescient. Inherent within the Tradition of Peace motion is a imaginative and prescient of a brand new world. The SDG targets are roughly key objects as to get there.” Emphasizing how “[c]risis is a driver for evolutionary breakthrough,” Hubbard requested, “[h]ow can we improve SDG fundamental targets with the actions for a tradition of peace?” Briefly, Hubbard labored instantly with the UN to advance the SDG agenda that was set in movement by her fellow WFS Board Member, Maurice Robust, who spearheaded the UNCED, the UNEP, the UN WCED, the UN Earth Summit, and UN Agenda 21.
Each Robust and Hubbard additionally participated within the State of the World Discussion board, which was fashioned and led by Mikhail Gorbachev. The SWF’s “Mission” assertion declared that the State of the World Discussion board was dedicated to “constructing a world coalition” of “stakeholders” who would “take part with companions worldwide in a non secular renaissance to maintain tempo with humanity’s scientific and technological development, believing that humanity should be as dedicated to ecological sustainability because the technology of wealth; world governance as nationwide sovereignty; and to a compassionate society as a lot as to the worldwide circulate of capital.” Acknowledged in another way, the SWF’s mission aimed to usher in a world “stakeholder capitalist” financial system regulated by “sustainable growth” provisions from technocratic world governance establishments, such because the UN and the WEF, propped up by evolutionary beliefs in a futurist “non secular renaissance.”
Modeled after the WEF, the Bilderberg Group, and the Membership of Rome, the State of the World Discussion board was structured as a globalist Spherical Desk NGO. Like its Spherical Desk predecessors, the SWF introduced collectively delegates from nationwide governments, multinational firms, company foundations, UN companies, and a number of different Spherical Desk NGOs, such because the WEF, the Membership of Rome, and the Council on Overseas Relations. In distinction with its Spherical Desk predecessors, the SWF was distinctive in that its contributors included a outstanding variety of “Non secular & Religious Leaders,” together with an array of New Agers and futurists, lots of whom had been additionally Hubbard’s associates.
Hubbard’s New Age and futurist comrades included the next SWF contributors:
- Deepak Chopra was listed as one of many SWF’s “Non secular & Religious Leaders.” Each he and Hubbard had been Fellows of the World Enterprise Academy, and he was an “ally” of Hubbard’s Delivery 2012 Marketing campaign [5]. Chopra praised Hubbard as “the voice for aware evolution of our time.”
- Stanislav Grof spoke on an SWF Panel titled “Legacy of Knowledge.” In The E book of Co-Creation, Grof is famous as one in all Hubbard’s “[c]olleagues and academics of aware evolution” [1].
- Jean Houston was listed as one of many SWF’s “Non secular & Religious Leaders.” In Delivery 2012 and Past, Houston is recorded as an “ally” of Hubbard’s Delivery 2012 Marketing campaign [5]. Moreover, Each she and Hubbard had been Fellows of the World Enterprise Academy.
Along with all of those New Age and futurist “co-creators” who’ve bolstered Hubbard’s gospel of aware evolution, different SWF contributors included quite a few top-level directors of UN companies which were propagating Malthusian inhabitants insurance policies in conjunction with sustainable growth initiatives. A few of these UN figureheads, who had been commissioned as delegates to the SWF, additionally collaborated with Hubbard.
For example, the Director-Common of the UN Academic, Scientific, and Cultural Group (UNESCO), Federico Mayor, served as a co-chair of the SWF; and he additionally spoke on the UN Excessive Stage Discussion board on the Tradition of Peace the place Hubbard gave her speech selling Agenda 2030’s SDGs. Moreover, UN Assistant Secretary Common, Robert Muller, served on the SWF Worldwide Coordinating Council. As Assistant Secretary Common, Muller served below UN Secretary Common Kurt Waldheim, who was beforehand a Nazi Wehrmacht officer. In keeping with UN Secretary Common Ban Ki-moon, Muller was ” instrumental within the conception of . . . the UN Improvement Programme” (UNDP) and the “UN Inhabitants Fund” (UNFPA); and he ” helped” Maurice Robust “orchestrate the first-ever UN Convention on the Human Setting.” In a blurb on the again cowl of Hubbard’s autobiography, Muller exalted Hubbard with the next accolades: “[i]f I’ve ever met an individual who’s totally aware of her obligations towards the earth, humanity and the cosmos, it’s actually Barbara Marx Hubbard. She is a real twenty first century girl” [2].
One other UN delegate to the SWF was Nafis Sadik, who was the Secretary Common of the 1994 UN Worldwide Convention on Inhabitants & Improvement, which stipulated the Neo-Malthusian household planning insurance policies that information Agenda 2030’s SDGs. Different UN delegates to the SWF included UNEP Govt Director Elizabeth Dowdeswell, UNESCO Director-Common Koichiro Matsurra, UNDP Director Sakiko Fukuda-Parr, UNDP Administrator Mark Malloch Brown, and UN Youngsters’s Fund (UNICEF) Govt Director, Carol Bellamy.
These UN companies, which partnered with the SWF, have all labored to advance the SDGs. On the identical time, based on the government producer of the SWF, the ultimate State of the World Discussion board was convened “along with the UN Millennial Summit [sic],” which established the UN MDGs that are actually revamped because the SDGs. Evidently, the UN-SWF alliance, which encompassed Hubbard’s circle of New Age futurists, was instrumental in laying the groundwork for the Agenda 2030 SDGs that are actually being accelerated by the WEF’s Nice Reset for the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
Not solely has the WEF taken up the SDG mantle of the UN and the SWF, however the State of the World Discussion board additionally hosted a number of prime officers of the World Financial Discussion board together with different high-ranking Spherical Desk globalists, together with distinguished members of the Membership of Rome and the Council on Overseas Relations. For example, Membership of Rome member Wouter van Dieren and Membership of Rome President Ashok Khosla had been “Further Audio system” on the SWF. Khosla can also be a member of the WEF, and he has served as an advisor to the UNDP, the UNEP, and the UN WCED, the latter two of which had been spearheaded by Maurice Robust, who was a WEF Basis Board Member and a “Featured Speaker” on the SWF. One other SWF “Featured Speaker” was WEF Trustee Marc Benioff whereas WEF member George Soros was a “Distinguished Visitor” of the SWF. Moreover, CFR member Stephen Rhinesmith served on the SWF Worldwide Coordinating Council, and he “performed a session on world management” for the WEF’s Younger International Leaders program, which recruits nationwide leaders to undertake SDG initiatives. Rhinesmith was additionally the Chairman of the Board of Advisors of the Esalen Soviet-American Change Program the place Hubbard’s “co-creators,” Velikhov and Goldin, had been Russian liaisons.
It’s price noting right here that the SWF was sponsored by Time Warner, which was bankrolled by its largest shareholder: WEF member Ted Turner, who has been a vocal proponent of inhabitants management. On the “Supporters” web page of the State of the World Discussion board’s web site, which is archived within the Wayback Machine, there was a quote from Turner warning that “[t]he inhabitants downside and environmental destruction that is happening on the earth will finally result in our demise if it’s not reversed.”
Altogether, the SWF helped launch the UN MDGs, which grew to become the SDGs, by bringing collectively representatives from the UN, the WEF, and the Membership of Rome, the latter of which propagated the “limits to development” theories that paved the best way for the SDGs. On the identical time, Hubbard and her cohort of New Age “evolutionaries” had been positioned in the midst of this sustainability nexus between the SWF, the UN, the WEF, and Membership of Rome. In sum, the SWF yoked collectively Hubbard and her New Age “co-creators” with UN representatives and Spherical Desk globalists, together with Robust and Gorbachev, who laid the groundwork for the UN SDGs. This was accomplished with a purpose to advance the Membership of Rome’s Malthusian sustainable growth insurance policies by means of the UN MDGs which were revamped by means of Agenda 2030, which is presently being bolstered by the WEF’s Nice Reset.
Caveat Lector
In response to my first installment on this investigative collection on Hubbard, a number of of her colleagues have critiqued my report, arguing that I unfairly represented Hubbard’s character. These Hubbard apologists have advised that she was nicely intentioned, however that she was taken benefit of by globalist oligarchs, who hijacked her concepts and co-opted her picture to usher in a technocratic New World Order below a veneer of New Age spirituality.
To make certain, with all due respect, neither this nor my earlier article is meant as a judgment of Hubbard’s private character. Relatively, this investigative collection goals solely to doc her involvement within the transhumanist and Malthusian-eugenic agendas of the UN-Spherical Desk oligarchy. Whereas it could be attainable that Hubbard was naïve to the machinations of her comrades on the UN, the Membership of Rome, the SWF, and the WEF, it’s laborious to consider that she was completely blind to the techno-fascist ambitions of lots of her associates.
However even for those who’re satisfied that Hubbard was unwittingly beguiled by these worldwide oligarchs, it can’t be ignored that she cooperated with the highest brass of a few of the exact same Spherical Desk NGOs and world governance establishments that are actually on the epicenter of the Nice Reset and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Past her liaisons with the UN-Spherical Desk syndicate, Hubbard explicitly championed transhumanism and Malthusian sustainable growth, that are the crux of the Nice Reset and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. No matter whether or not Hubbard was gullibly seduced by unsavory elitists, or whether or not she willingly lent her New Age ethos to trailblaze for the technocratic enterprises of globalist oligarchs, it can’t be denied that Hubbard’s writings and speeches explicitly name for transhumanism and Malthusian inhabitants management on a number of events.
Within the subsequent installments of this collection, I’ll dig deeper into the important thing influencers behind Hubbard’s Malthusian-eugenic transhumanism. These embrace Jonas Salk, Laurance Rockefeller, and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. I can even unveil how Hubbard’s affiliations with the World Future Society, the Human Potential Motion, and the Basis for Aware Evolution had been related to networks of alleged pedophiles and sexual abuse cults.
References:
[1] Barbara Marx Hubbard, The Revelation: Our Disaster Is a Delivery (The E book of Co-Creation) (Sonoma, CA: Basis for Aware Evolution, 1993).
[2] Barbara Marx Hubbard, The Starvation of Eve: One Girl’s Odyssey Towards the Future (Eastsound, WA: Island Pacific NW, 1989).
[3] Graeme Maxton and Jørgen Randers, Reinventing Prosperity: Managing Financial Development to Cut back Unemployment, Inequality, and Local weather Change (A Report back to the Membership of Rome) (Vancouver: Greystone Books, 2016).
[4] Barbara Marx Hubbard, Emergence: The Shift from Ego to Essence (10 Steps to the Common Human) (Charlottesville, VA: Walsch Books, 2001).
[5] Barbara Marx Hubbard and The Welcoming Committee, Delivery 2012 and Past: Humanity’s Nice Shift to the Age of Aware Evolution (USA: Shift Books, 2012).
