FBI Director Christopher Wray: “With respect to former president Trump, there’s some query about whether or not or not it’s a bullet or shrapnel that hit his ear.” pic.twitter.com/3TNjLZp4S1
— Republicans in opposition to Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) July 25, 2024
Right here we go.
Lastly.
The speed of the bullet passing that near Trump’s cranium would have induced a shockwave and mind bleeding. There’s kinetic vitality surrounding the bullet. Persons are asking about this. CNN printed an article about it.
“It might have truly been shrapnel, which is why he solely acquired a small reduce and was out making marketing campaign calls – together with to RFK Jr. – instantly afterward” bypasses the query of how he wouldn’t have had some form of mind harm from a bullet passing that near his cranium.
Christopher Wray, the FBI director, has raised questions on whether or not Donald Trump was truly shot by a bullet in the course of the assassination try in opposition to the previous president earlier this month or whether or not he was as an alternative struck by shrapnel.Throughout a listening to on Wednesday in Washington, earlier than the Home judiciary committee, Wray informed lawmakers that it was not clear what exactly induced the harm to Trump’s ear in the course of the taking pictures at his marketing campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, earlier this month.
The burst of gunfire from a shooter on a roof with a sightline to the stage and crowd killed one rally-goer and left others wounded.“There’s some query about whether or not or not it’s a bullet or shrapnel that hit his ear,” Wray testified. “As I sit right here proper now, I don’t know whether or not that bullet, along with inflicting the grazing, might have additionally landed some other place.”
Nicely, that’s some extra very critical and really handy incompetence.
Wouldn’t the FBI shut all the grounds of the taking pictures till they discovered the entire bullets?
Newsweek printed an article about Wray’s statements, and conservative retards flipped their lids.
Donald Trump may not have been shot in spite of everything https://t.co/60KvtkhY1N pic.twitter.com/fObe2Jr3iG
— Newsweek (@Newsweek) July 25, 2024
It doesn’t make any sense, however they began attacking Newsweek for simply reporting on Wray’s statements.
That is actually protecting some floor, however @Newsweek is likely to be probably the most embarrassing “information group” in all the nation. They always publish BS, however that is subsequent stage Trump derangement. They need to be ashamed of themselves!!! pic.twitter.com/ggjWWPCU7S
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) July 25, 2024
Based on the media:
Kamala was NOT the Border Czar.
Kamala was NOT probably the most liberal U.S. Senator.
Kamala did NOT promote defund the police.
Kamala did NOT say 18-24 year-olds have been dumb.
And Donald Trump by no means obtained shot.
You do not hate these folks sufficient. https://t.co/tq7mFZB2Zl
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) July 25, 2024
I don’t suppose they learn the article.
Apparently their problem was with the headline itself. They claimed that shrapnel is part of a bullet, so you’re “shot” for those who get hit by shrapnel. Firstly, that’s a silly semantics argument, and secondly, there’s a time period “hit by shrapnel,” which is distinguished from “getting shot.”
They need to help this, nevertheless, as a result of it’s an evidence that’s at the very least viable, whereas “grazed the ear” is simply completely dumb.
Curiously, in the event that they did declare shrapnel hit Trump’s ear, they might additionally need to admit that silly “picture of a bullet” is pretend.
They by no means ought to have launched that pretend picture. It proves the entire thing is pretend.
Did you catch that Doug Mills, the one who supposedly took that picture, is identical man who allegedly took the picture of George W. Bush being knowledgeable about 9/11?
Fairly wild coincidence, huh?
This complete Trump taking pictures factor is such an apparent rip-off.
Nobody will ever know what occurred precisely, however the FBI director doing harm management and explaining why it seems to be a lot like a reduce, quite than a bullet would, goes a large means in the direction of vindicating me.
The physician who examined Trump would have been in a position to inform if it was a bullet or shrapnel, and he determined to say it was a bullet, as a result of that was the narrative. Now there are all these folks saying “that doesn’t actually make sense,” so they arrive out with this.
But when it was shrapnel, the place did it come from? A ricochet off of one thing presumably, however what? I assume folks can have a look at the photographs from the positioning of the taking pictures and make their very own conclusions.
The almost certainly choices for what truly occurred is:
- Trump had a health care provider reduce his ear earlier than the occasion, and he reached as much as pull off a bandage, inflicting blood to return out. This could be very simple, provided that the ears bleed a lot.
Different choices embody:
- A blood capsule being popped on Trump’s ear by him or a Secret Service agent
- A blade being utilized by Trump or a Secret Service agent
Regardless of the case, the CIA was clearly concerned, organising the patsy. The CIA would have the power to power the SS to face down, which they clearly did (nobody even denies that half).
It’s almost certainly that the patsy was taking pictures blanks, or not taking pictures something in any respect (the SS apparently moved the physique and messed with the alleged spent cartridges), as a result of in any other case he seemingly would have hit Trump. Nobody can miss that shot, therefore the speculation that it’s a “miracle.” However not one of the folks claiming it’s a miracle will clarify why God would miraculously intervene to save lots of a man who helps abortion, anal marriage, and limitless wars for the Christ-killing Jews.
A second shooter would have been there to shoot into the group and kill that fireman. And earlier than you ask: no, I don’t suppose they might have informed Trump folks have been going to die. There can be no purpose to inform him that. I don’t know that I feel he’s ethical sufficient to not go together with that even when they did inform him, however he would most likely be a bit squeamish about it, and once more, there’s simply no purpose to inform him. (Observe: They may even inform him afterwards that it was an accident that actual folks obtained damage, which might additionally make him consider he had been in actual hazard, which might make his performing when speaking concerning the occasion higher.)
I’m Not Backing Down on This and I Will Proceed to be Vindicated
I do know lots of people who typically observe together with the whole lot I write are skeptical of me on this problem. I get that. However I don’t pander.
This Wray “shrapnel idea” is a large vindication of what I stated from day 1. I’ll proceed to be vindicated.
This was a pretend assassination try.
There isn’t any means that retardo MK Extremely man (each his dad and mom are psychiatrists, by the way in which) getting on the roof was a results of Secret Service incompetence. It’s not potential. I don’t care about DEI; the snipers select their very own perches, and they aren’t retards, they needed to have been ordered to not shield that perch and so they needed to have been ordered to not shoot the patsy till after the taking pictures.
I’m telling you: I do know I’m proper about this, and you’re going to see that I’m proper when Trump wins and goes full-Israel like no president in US historical past.
