Simply days after the discharge of a scathing report detailing a tradition of widespread sexual harassment and discrimination on the Federal Deposit Insurance coverage Company, its chair, Martin Gruenberg submitted congressional testimony on Tuesday that indicated he had no plans to step down.
In ready remarks he plans to ship to the Home Monetary Providers Committee Wednesday, Mr. Gruenberg largely repeated his earlier statements — that he was sorry for the harassment and abuse workers suffered, and that he and his workers had been already engaged on making modifications.
“I settle for the findings of the report and, as chairman, I take full duty,” he stated.
The hearings come as Mr. Gruenberg, a Democrat, faces calls from Republican lawmakers to resign. He has thus far survived these calls for with the backing of the White Home and key Democratic lawmakers like Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Consultant Maxine Waters of California.
Ought to Mr. Gruenberg be pressured to depart the company after the hearings, that would additionally put into jeopardy a rule that the company is proposing together with different federal financial institution regulators, to tighten and develop oversight of the nation’s largest lenders, however which has been fiercely opposed by massive banks.
Mr. Gruenberg has confronted intense criticism because the launch of the Could 7 report, which described a tradition of rampant abuse from senior examiners and different officers on the company, together with cases through which supervisors despatched their workers nude images of themselves or took them to brothels throughout enterprise journeys. The report was commissioned by a particular committee that the F.D.I.C.’s board shaped in response to a sequence of a Wall Road Journal articles final 12 months.
Carried out by the Cleary Gottlieb regulation agency, the evaluation additionally questioned whether or not Mr. Gruenberg, who has led the company for 10 of the final 13 years, might stay efficient in his position, given “the incidents of — and ensuing repute for — dropping his mood and expressing anger with workers.”
An F.D.I.C. spokesman stated on Tuesday that Mr. Gruenberg had been assembly with each Democrats and Republicans to explain the steps the company was taking to repair the issues.
The way in which the F.D.I.C is structured might supply him some safety. The company’s chief — nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate — chairs a five-person board of administrators. Not more than three board members might be members of the identical political celebration, based on the company’s guidelines.
Proper now, with Mr. Gruenberg in cost, Democrats maintain a majority of the 5 board votes, which suggests he’s not more likely to face a revolt from the opposite two members of his celebration, making him comparatively protected from inner stress to resign.
Jonathan Macey, a professor of company regulation at Yale, stated issues would seemingly be a lot tougher for Mr. Gruenberg within the personal sector.
“I feel it might be very troublesome for the C.E.O. of a public firm to outlive this scandal, notably as a result of it seems to be fairly widespread and longstanding,” he stated. “The board of administrators can be apprehensive that they themselves can be topic to shareholder litigation for not adequately supervising what was occurring within the firm.”
The White Home is dealing with questions on how Mr. Gruenberg’s habits, as described within the report, might be tolerated in gentle of President Biden’s zero-tolerance coverage for office bullying, which beforehand led to the resignations of a White Home staffer and a cabinet-level official.
A day after the discharge of the report, Republicans in Congress, together with the chairman of the Home Oversight Committee, James Comer of Kentucky, wrote to President Biden requesting that the White Home flip over all communications and paperwork associated to the allegations in opposition to Mr. Gruenberg.
“As , the president, after all, expects the administration to replicate the values of decency and integrity and to guard the rights and dignity of workers,” Karine Jean-Pierre, the White Home press secretary, stated at a information convention final week.
Eradicating Mr. Gruenberg would elevate the company’s present vice chair, Travis Hill, a Republican. He has been a senior chief for six years, and was a senior member of the manager staff of Jelena McWilliams, the chair from June 2018 to February 2022 who was appointed by former President Donald J. Trump.
Ms. Waters, the highest-ranking Democrat on the Home Monetary Providers Committee, the place Mr. Gruenberg will testify on Wednesday, nonetheless helps him. In an announcement on Thursday, she criticized the report for specializing in Mr. Gruenberg whereas excluding his predecessors.
“Tone on the high is vital and optimistic office tradition must be modeled and bolstered from the highest down,” she stated, including that the report “utterly ignores the actions of the 2 earlier Republican chairs.”
The destiny of the proposed overhaul to capital necessities for the nation’s largest banks is also affected if Mr. Gruenberg departs. The banks have been furiously preventing it, claiming that it might hurt their capability to lend.
Help for the capital guidelines proposal typically runs alongside partisan traces. The 2 Republicans on the five-member F.D.I.C. board, together with Mr. Hill, are more likely to vote in opposition to it in its present kind.
In his testimony on Wednesday, Mr. Gruenberg plans to checklist some key elements of the proposal that regulators are contemplating altering after suggestions from the trade, together with how the brand new capital guidelines would deal with residential mortgages, some investments that include tax credit and a few fee-based buying and selling and banking actions. With out Mr. Gruenberg, there would in all probability not be sufficient assist for the proposal. The White Home and Democrats in Congress typically need to see the capital rule succeed.
On Thursday, a day after the Home Monetary Providers Committee listening to, Mr. Gruenberg is scheduled to testify earlier than the Senate Banking Committee. The back-to-back hearings are a part of an everyday course of by Congress to supervise banking regulators.
