A huge component to the success of the Mormons can be found in the methods via which they evangelise.
Firstly, they pursue “Witness Evangelism” — they seem extremely genuine and kind and they can’t do enough to help you. Accordingly, you bond with them and you are more open to their ideas, as seen in the famous episode, “All About Mormons,” of South Park.
Secondly, there is “Flirty Fishing.” If you are a male “investigator” (one who shows an interest in their church) then you will be found with two young and normally highly attractive female missionaries. This, even if unconsciously, is a form of manipulation; you associate the church with beauty — even with sexual arousal and the possibility of access to fit, fertile women. It’s a way of emotionally drawing you into the Latter-day Saints and thus into their dogmas and taboos, such as believing Joseph Smith was a prophet or eschewing alcohol and coffee because Smith implied you should.
Now, imagine a quasi-religious group — in the sense of ardent dogmas, a semi-Satanic out-group, a sense of implicitly eternal mission and all the rest of it — which turned all of this on its head. In this sect, leading members would make a point of seeming as unpleasant as possible: Narcissistically morally superior, braggarts, gaslighters, liars, obvious victim-signallers, uncaring about the murder of native-English little girls, but more concerned about the kind of people that murder them, hypocritical and underhanded. Imagine if, in addition, the missionaries’ purpose was not to cause you to associate the group with beauty but, rather, to associate it with a sense of physical repugnance. And further envisage that they produced a documentary so incompetent and poorly executed that, despite every media attempt to promote it — including manifestly fake news about being too scared to show it at a film festival lest staff get attacked — it pretty much bombed.
Are you visualizing all that? If so, you are visualizing Exposing the Far Right, a recent under-cover documentary by a Jewish-founded UK “Anti-Fascist” group “Hope Not Hate” screened on Britain’s nakedly Woke Channel 4 on October 21 at 10pm, for two long hours.
In essence, an extremely affluent and privileged young man (private school, father the BBC Science editor, independently wealthy, grandson of a spy, great-grandson of noblemen. His sister Kitty designs shoes for Kanye’s Yeezee Designs, and he likely state asset making him, essentially, above the law and meaning that Woke extremists have penetrated the secret services. They don’t tell us any of this, obviously — I and others discovered it. A low-testosterone man called Harry Shukman (whose father, David Shukman, is Jewish) somehow got hold of a convincing passport under the name Chris Morton (again, the passport issue is not mentioned in the film).
Having been vetted by his target groups, Shukman poses, variously, as a naïve young man interested in the working-class Britain First Party and a moneyed chap who wishes to invest in a group that researches “race science” and “eugenics” — in reality, unabashed empirical science and genomics. To make things sinister, they stress how “educated” this set is; they have PhDs and so on; they are evil scientists. Through his lies and secretly recorded footage (including, it seems, breaking Greek Law by covertly filming), Shukman induces the group to name their Silicon Valley investor. Also, members of the political party, once a bit drunk, tell a few crude racist jokes, as less-educated people commonly do. How can they not see through someone, I found myself thinking, who says, of the Pioneer Fund (an old fund for race research that supported scientists like Phil Rushton) in a childish voice, “Tell me about the Pioneer Fund! It sounds really cool!”
In order to cause you to associate both the intellectual and grass roots “far right” with evil, this is interspersed with discussions of the British anti-Islamic-rape-gang campaigner Tommy Robinson, eugenics before WWII, the British Union of Fascists in the 1930s, Charlottesville (because, apparently, that’s what “far right ideas lead to,” as, apparently, the mobbed driver deliberately crashed his car into a young leftist woman), and interviews with senior members of Hope Not Hate, sometimes as part of a fly-on-the-wall-style documentary; talking to each other in a Tallinn hotel before Shukman attends the Scandza Conference in May 2023, for example.
I spoke at this conference. I recall that “Morton” approached me and asked for a “selfie” before, if I recall correctly, enquiring how many people I thought died in the Holocaust. At once, I was extremely suspicious of him. I informed him that I thought it was the number that both the prosecution and defence agreed on in the Irving vs Lipstadt trial in the year 2000. This, of course, was not what he wanted me to say. I was later invited to sit in on a Zoom call with someone involved in the group that Shukman had infiltrated in order to get my view on whether “Morton” should be trusted. He seemed nervous and asked far too many questions, including unnecessary and rather nosy and leading ones. I stated that I thought he might be a mole, but was not believed. He later covertly filmed at an event of mine in London. Always careful what I said around him, I was, accordingly, not even mentioned in the documentary. I appear on the Zoom call with my face blurred.
So, that is Exposing the Far Right, and it clearly hasn’t “gone viral.” It may have worked better in 2004 when the internet was in its infancy (so state lies could not be checked as easily) — at a time when we were less polarised, the Left were less obviously insane, and trust in the Woke Establishment hadn’t been destroyed by Covid and various Psy-Ops in the UK media over the recent riots set off by an ethnic Rwandan boy murdering three little English girls with the Leftist government condemning as “Far Right Thugs” all who expressed emotion about this and jailing people for years for rightfully angry tweets. But October 2024 is not that world.
What Exposing the Far Right gives us is the opposite of those Mormon Missionaries. Firstly, it’s as though they want us to associate their ideas with disgust. All but two of the Hope Not Hate campaigners we meet are remarkably unattractive; which is simply bad PR. Their leader, Nick Lowles, who is apparently part Mauritian, looks like a cross between an angry, chubby frog and Penfold from the 1980s cartoon Danger Mouse. Harry Shukman is weedy, insipid and incredibly effeminate. The Swedish chap who’s with him in Tallinn, Patrick Hemson, is even more effeminate and even more mutated, with sticking-out ears and practically no gap between his eyes. And for a Swede who presumably spends a lot of time with Brits speaking to them in English, his English is accented to an irritating degree. He and Shukman like to hug each other or fist bump as, presumably, shaking hands would be too manly and too hideously White.
Simon Mulholland has an unusual (he’s part Anglo-Indian) but not ugly face and is actually muscular, but rather ruins this by pretending to cry because he’s been doxed and an enemy has written the word “Rapist” — he’s an alleged “rapist,” he tells us, and Knowles is an alleged “paedophile” — as written on fencing opposite his house. Mulholland, of course, doxes other people — such as “Raw Egg Nationalist” — and has invaded their privacy via covert filming. Georgina Laming, the token actual English one, is dull and frumpy. Then there are two British Indian girls; one with bulging eyes (likely a thyroid problem) and the other, Misrah Malik, okay-looking; so, naturally, we hardly saw her at all. In essence, Hope Not Hate are a combination of genetic mutants and foreigners, just as my book The Past is a Future Country notes should be the case, for evolutionary reasons, with the far left.
Their behaviour reflects the Machiavellianism and Narcissism that is associated with the far left. They jarringly and smugly brag about their various successes, such as in relation to persecuting Tommy Robinson or simply having lots of money to throw around on their projects; they project, by claiming that it is their opponents that “encourage violence” whereas it is their opponents who must meet in Eastern Europe to avoid Antifa mobs; they talk down to the viewers, even assuming they won’t know what the Overton Window is; they gaslight you by saying that these evil far-right types “believe” that most of the immigrants on small boats are “fighting age males” when this is a fact and they also seem to dispute the very existence of Muslim grooming gangs (tell that to the thousands of English girls they raped); and they refer to their political opponents as “horrid” and as “cunts.” They ooze a moral self-satisfaction wherein not being “horrid” (defined as holding to their dogmas) is superior to being intellectually honest.
Worst of all, they want to believe that they are competent and powerful (they can take down “the far right”) but, on the other hand, most of them manipulatively victim-signal — childhood “racism,” being scared of “racist” politicians as a child even though you pass for White, being doxed, having Jewish ancestors (although not mentioning the ones that were nobility and/or went to or even was the Provost of Eton) — in order to get you to feel sorry for them. Manipulation: It’s what Dark Triad types do, but we increasingly see through it.
Finally, the documentary is just so dull and disappointing. A good documentary is original, tight and highly focused. For example, they could have presented a film solely on infiltrating what they see as latter-day eugenicists. But instead we meander through a series of hardly-even-connected groups, ranging from “far right thugs” to based academics, with much of it re-treading old ground, padded out into two hours by unnecessary asides and predictable fly-on-the-wall comments.
Exposing the Far Right, artistically-speaking, is a lesson in how not to make a documentary. Of course if, as I argued in my book Woke Eugenics, they are actively trying to cause us to associate their ideas with disgust and anger, such that all but the mutants flee from them and band together into a healthy, based hold-out of civilization, then, perhaps, Exposing the Far Right can be seen as a triumph.
