On Wednesday, an public sale home in Europe will put a portray by Gustav Klimt up on the market, with a preauction estimate of not less than 30 million euros (about $32 million).
Whoever buys it would receive a portray by an artist whose main works hardly ever come up on the market, but in addition a portrait whose topic, provenance and present possession are both unknown, not public or the topic of debate.
The auctioneer promoting the portray is just not a global heavyweight like Sotheby’s or Christie’s, however im Kinsky, an area home in Vienna whose greatest sale till now was in 2010: $6.1 million, for a portray by Egon Schiele.
At a information convention in January saying the sale of the mysterious Klimt work, Ernst Ploil, the co-chief govt of im Kinsky, stated: “All is at midnight. At any time when there’s an argument for one thing, counterarguments come up many times.”
A few of the debate facilities on the id of the younger lady portrayed. Different questions have arisen about what occurred to the art work throughout the Anschluss, when Austria was annexed into the Third Reich.
The portray was owned by a Jewish household throughout that interval, and there aren’t any paperwork that file what occurred to it throughout these years when Austria’s Jewish inhabitants was persecuted, deported and murdered and their possessions plundered by the Nazis.
The questions surrounding the portrait have solely added to the curiosity within the sale of this work by Klimt, one of many founders of the influential Vienna Secessionist motion, whose extremely ornamental work are actually among the many artwork market’s most coveted trophies. Final June at Sotheby’s in London, his “Girl With a Fan” fetched $108.4 million.
The story of this portray, referred to as “Portrait of Fräulein Lieser,” begins in Vienna in 1917, when a teenage daughter of a rich Jewish household made the primary of 9 visits to Klimt’s studio to pose.
Klimt’s pocket book presents a clue, however an unsatisfying one, to the id of the topic. It information every go to by a “Lis,” signifying a member of the prosperous Lieser household. However Justus and Adolf Lieser, two German-born brothers who based Austria’s first mechanical hemp rope and cord manufacturing unit, every had teenage daughters.
The portrait was by no means completed. Artwork historians consider the unsigned canvas was in Klimt’s studio when the artist died in 1918, in the course of the influenza pandemic. For many years the portray has solely been identified from one black-and-white {photograph} that was taken within the Nineteen Twenties. Afterward, the portrait’s whereabouts was largely unknown.
The public sale home means that “Fräulein Lieser” would possibly probably depict one of many two teenage daughters of Henriette Lieser, who was referred to as Lilly: both Helene, who grew to become a distinguished economist, or Annie, a celebrated dancer. A member of the Landau household, one in every of fin-de-siècle Vienna’s very wealthiest, Lilly divorced Justus Lieser in 1905 and have become a patron of the Viennese avant-garde.
Im Kinsky’s suggestion is predicated on a list card on the destructive of that previous black-and-white picture of the portray within the Austrian Nationwide Library. The cardboard signifies that in 1925, the portrait was hanging in Lilly’s palatial residence in Argentinierstrasse.
Lilly was deported by the Nazis in 1942 and murdered at Auschwitz in 1943, based on the catalog.
However her daughters survived the Holocaust. Neither is understood to have tried to seek out or declare the Klimt after World Conflict II. And the portray doesn’t seem in Lilly Lieser’s declaration of worthwhile belongings that every one Jews in Germany and Austria had to attract up for the Nazis in 1938.
Nevertheless, current analysis, and articles within the Austrian newspaper Der Normal, help the view that the portrait is one in every of Lilly’s daughters. The articles describe letters from 1961 that have been lately found within the archive of Mumok, Vienna’s museum of recent artwork, that point out the portray at the moment was within the possession of a person named Adolf Hagenauer.
In a single letter, Hagenauer is upbraided by a curator and future director of the museum, Werner Hofmann, who accuses him of buying the portrait from a Jew who had “died within the fuel chambers,” as Lilly had.
In the course of the Anschluss, Hagenauer, the managing director of a household grocery enterprise, was married to the daughter of Lilly Lieser’s butler, based on analysis by Georg Gaugusch, writer of a 5,000-page historical past in regards to the Jewish upper-middle class in Vienna.
Gaugusch and Olga Kronsteiner, who wrote the Der Normal articles, have raised the chance that Lilly traded the portray to Hagenauer for provisions because the persecution of Jews heightened in 1938, the yr by which Hagenauer is documented as making use of for membership of the Nazi social gathering.
Hagenauer in the end gave the Klimt to his daughter, based on Der Normal. The newspaper reported that the daughter died final yr, having bequeathed the portray to a distant relative, who’s the undisclosed vendor right now. Ploil stated in an e mail that Der Normal was appropriate on this element.
However two Klimt consultants, Tobias Natter and Alfred Weidinger, say the portray truly depicts a unique teenage woman: Margarethe Constance Lieser, the daughter of Justus’s brother Adolf and his spouse, Silvia. Adolf died in 1919. Margarethe married the Hungarian Catholic convert Henry de Gelsey in 1921 and moved to Budapest, adopted by her mom in 1938.
Weidinger stated in an e mail that in 2007 he had been launched to Margarethe’s son William de Gelsey, an funding banker. He stated de Gelsey, who died in London in 2021, with no youngsters, had requested his assist in monitoring the portray.
He was satisfied that Klimt had painted his mom, Weidinger stated: “He stated there was by no means any doubt about it, as a result of his household all the time talked in regards to the portrait of his mom.”
De Gelsey made a provision in his will for a donation to a Catholic charity if the portray have been rediscovered and offered, however by no means registered the Klimt portrait as lacking on the database of Artwork Loss Register, which locates and recovers stolen artworks.
Weidinger and Natter stated they weren’t approached by the public sale home for his or her opinions on the portray. Natter stated in an e mail that “opposite to all worldwide requirements, the public sale home has didn’t contain the 2 main Klimt consultants, each of whom have revealed a catalog raisonné.”
Im Kinsky stated in an e mail that it had not approached Natter as a result of his views of the portray have been identified from his catalog, but it surely had consulted not less than three unbiased artwork historians.
Im Kinsky’s public sale catalog says that, as a part of the trouble to promote the portray, its present house owners had acknowledged the “many ambiguities and historic gaps” in its provenance and reached “a good and simply resolution” with authorized successors of the Lieser household. This settlement meant that, from a “purely authorized viewpoint,” it was “immaterial” who commissioned the portray and which of the three Lieser daughters was depicted.
Ploil stated that no matter which Lieser daughter is portrayed, the portray had been unlawfully acquired in the course of the Nazi interval. “Each type of taking away in the course of the Nazi time needs to be handled as illegal,” he stated.
When requested if de Gelsey’s nominated charity can be a beneficiary of the public sale, Ploil, who can also be a accomplice within the Vienna regulation agency Ploil Boesch, stated in an e mail that although a confidentiality clause prevented him from commenting on that particular level, “all authorized successors of Adolf, Justus and Henriette Lieser are a part of the settlement.”
Jil Birnbaum, a solicitor on the London regulation agency Wedlake Bell, which handles the de Gelsey property, stated that the heirs of William and his brother Alexander, who died in 2006, are included within the settlement.
Beneath Austrian regulation, authorized agreements between house owners and successors can, in sure circumstances, settle a restitution subject as an alternative of the formal return of a looted art work. The work then needs to be granted an export license by the state. The Austrian Federal Monuments Authority issued such a license to the Klimt on Oct. 23, 2023.
“Restitution is a really delicate subject, and we’ve to analysis loads and be very correct in regards to the info,” stated Erika Jakubovits, govt director of the presidency of Israelitische Kultusgemeinde Wien, the Jewish Group of Vienna.
“Solely the rightful heirs ought to be those to settle with,” Jakubovits stated. “A authorized opinion on the heirs ought to be ready earlier than beginning settlement procedures,” she added, alluding to what she views as remaining questions on who’re the authorized heirs to “Portrait of Fräulein Lieser.”
Although the most recent analysis reported in Der Normal takes the view that the Lieser woman is prone to be Helene, the long run economist, Ploil stated in an e mail that it was essential to not go too far in particularly figuring out the topic of the portrait at this junction.
He famous that attorneys for the de Gelsey household “nonetheless follow their opposite opinion that Adolf Lieser has commissioned the portray — displaying Margarethe Lieser and never Helene.”
Due to the inconclusiveness, Ploil stated, “the catalog won’t be modified or amended.”
Natter, the Klimt scholar, stated the id of the woman had wider penalties. “The id is essential because it permits us to return to the commissioner and tells us loads in regards to the provenance and possession historical past,” he stated. “It actually does make a distinction.”
